RolStoppable said:
Shameless said: If it was more to do with the games, then why didn't the Gamecube or N64 sell well? |
No constant flow of worthwile games on the N64 and to a lesser extent the GC and a competition that offered similar experiences at a constant rate and in higher numbers.
|
Do you think there's been a constant flow of worthwhile games for the Wii from anyone but Nintendo? Look at the N64 for example. The console had two of the most influential and highly rated games of all time in Ocarina and Mario 64 and loads more and was, essentially, destroyed in sales. Was it because of the lack of support of the third parties? Obviously not because the Wii still sells. Was it because the competition had better first party software? Definitely not. Was it because the other consoles had better features or power? No.
The situation was completely unchanged during the Gamecube's lifespan: Wind Waker, Pikmin and Mario Sunshine were similarly fantastic games, but the system was, once again, destroyed in sales
Then, along comes the Wii. The traditional Nintendo games are offering the same experience and appealing to the same audience as they always have, yet the console is outselling everything. The Wii is in exactly the same third party situation as it always has been, Nintendo are making games to the same formula they always have done and yet the console is first. If people were buying the console for software, why didn't they buy the N64 and Gamecube for the same games? It's a fact that if you enjoy SMG you would have enjoyed SM64 and SMS, if you enjoyed Brawl you would have enjoyed Melee, if you enjoyed MKWii you would have enjoyed MK64 and MKDD, if you enjoyed LOZTP you would have enjoyed all of the previous Zelda games.
So why didn't people buy them? Do you think the Wii would be selling anywhere near the rate it is now if there had been no waggle-mote? When you realise that the only answer is because of the peripherals, I will accept your apologies. 