Celb said: ampillion said: Celb said: CrazzyMan said: just curious, what you people gonna say, when (if):
Killzone 2 will look like e3 2k5 trailer or even better. MGS4 will look like TGS05 trailer or even better. FFXIII will look like e3 2k6 trailer or even better. GT5 will look like real life. AFrika will look even better. Getaway 3 also will look like real world.
or that will not matter to you?
i just know, that when there will apper articles like "ps3 is doomed", people will give links to some videos from e3 2k7 or TGS07 and say: "watch this and shut up". But still, what people you will say, or i just need to wait 4 weeks more to see that? =)) |
of course those dont matter, only old mario and waggle matters. MGS was all real time, FF13 had real time gameplay. |
Psst. Thanks for contributing to the thread. Your 'addition' to the discussion was greatly appreciated. Edit- Sorry, I also meant to add, "Troll.", to this post. Thanks in advance. |
got your panties in a twist. its funny ad hell reading wii fanboys write pages of how FF13 or MGS4 dont matter, how GT is not a big seller and all their BS. |
Yes, obviously I'm a Wii fanboy because.. I dunno, maybe I own one? Nope. Sorry, I don't, the newest system I own is a DS, and I've gotten maybe four games for it because I'm poor. Because I have something to gain from the Wii winning? Nope. Sorry again.
I'm sorry that you can't handle intelligent discussion with anything short of fanboy rhetoric though. You let me know when your Folding@Home cures cancer. We're talking about gaming history here, and I don't seem to recall any 600 dollar systems ever magically making a comeback because of a few games. Troll.
@Crazzyman
I'm in a lot of sales and/or general discussion threads, I'm not sitting around in only PS3 threads. Hell, I tried starting a couple threads of just general gaming speculation, but not much came of them. I don't care if you've got an opinion, so long as you can make that opinion intelligently. If you have reasons to cite where you think the PS3 will come back due to prior gaming history, then by all means, feel free to point that out.
At no point have I straight up bashed any system for anything beyond that which everyone's already well aware of. (PS3's price, MS's failure rates, Wii's lazy developers) PS3 games will of course look better. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to believe that a 600 dollar system might do more things than a 250 dollar one.
Comparing the PS3 to the DS is a foolish comparison. The price ranges are again, totally different. You're talking about a huge, HD capable piece of hardware against a small, portable gaming device. The reason why the DS went on to overtake the PSP? I'd have to say it's because developers started seeing the uses of the touch screen, couple that with cheaper games on a cheaper system with a focus on games, and the DS pulled away and never looked back.
Honestly noone's going to buy one system for just one game, you might initially buy it 'just for' Halo, Mario, FF, GT, or whatever. But that's not very cost effective entertainment is it? You'll get tired of the game sooner or later, or at least need a diversion. You're going to buy another game for it. And possibly two or three more. If you're into gaming. If not, and you buy it for one game, and that's it... how again does that help any company? They're not making any game sales off you. It's all about the initial investment. Right now, the Wii is kicking both their asses because it's the only one of the three that contains a pack-in game by default AND is the lowest price of the three.
There will be some people that will pick up the PS3 because of some of those games, noone's saying it's a terrible system. It's a great system. But it's not accessible for everyone on an impulse. There will obviously be some people that will drop down on a FF offering or a MGS4. But only the hardcore, previous fans of the series. Which leads me back to my original concept.
The PS3 will be the N64/GC/Xbox of this generation. Because there's just not enough 'hardcore gamers' to buy up every PS3 out there. And you're kidding yourself if the casual or non-gamer is going to just pick one up on a whim. The current marketing history is already proving that.
Hey, there's nothing wrong with sticking up for your consoles, and people that are outright proclaiming doom for PS3 and Sony are pretty foolish in their own right. Noone wants a system to collapse, that means less options in the market, which leads to less innovation and incentive to get people to buy X system over Y system. Your PS3's will have plenty of first party games that won't show up to the 360's party. Which is why I compared it to the 64/GC. It'll be a system primarily driven by Sony's games and multiplatform titles. Accept that fact, and have fun with those games. ITS THE POINT OF GAMING IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Unless of course, you're like that troll guy.