Wow. Missed that. It's late. I'm out.

Only 7.6?!!! That's a pretty nice score! My opinion, too high. One of the highest score check gamerankings. Got the JP version, game is nice and fun to play but not too fancy, especially the GFX. I'm no GFX whore at all, but they could have done it a lot better. All with all IGN score is suprising high. I paid about 35USD for it, more then enough.

Nice? Ha, ha, ha!! 7.6 sucks in my opinion. No famous game ever gets lower than 8.0. I mean, Star Fox Adventures got 8.0, and so many people hated it. 7.9- is on my no no list. And why are we still looking at IGN? It's only one reviewer. Why aren't we looking at the average of many reviews?

this game will sell on par with wii play but im getting this game so when i go on vacation my family will have someting to do together

 Because only IGN scored this game as for now AFAIK. Ports of DS on next gen system...

Yea the $50 price tag kills it for me, *maybe* if it was $30.

I doubt it will sell that well. I mean, it will probably be over a million, but it doesn't come with a free controller worth $39...

- " It's shallow "

-16:9 vs 4:3 gripe

- no online mode

- yesteryear graphics

how are these negatives? It's a title for casuals and it is meant to be that way. Those are negatives for hardcore gamers, but not the targeted audience. Ugh

I agree that $50 its too much. I guess it will have legs because of price reductions.

How are they not negatives?  Just because someone doesn't want to play a 100 hr long RPG doesn't mean they want to play absolute crap.  The TV market is going 16:9.  Most gamers (casual or not) have or will soon have widescreen TVs.  It's annoying as crap to play with letterbox. 

Most every one uses the internet.  Just because casuals won't get into half life doesn't mean they won't get online with the wii. 

Yesteryear graphics are okay if they are at least xbox 1 quality.  The fact that Nintendo is pushing out N64 graphics on the Wii is dissapointing.