well its good that they published it,but they didnt develope it so techinically they havent really made any great games on wii

I remember Ubi-soft saying that the new Prince of Persia will be heavily influenced by Zelda TP, this was back in I believe march or february... I just assumed it would be on the Wii... oh well.

Is that really a reason to boycott a company? If dumb PR statements were a good enough reason to make such a stink, the entire world would be boycotting Sony for Ken Kutaragi alone, not to mention Peter Dille and all the other jackasses in that company.

And MS would be boycotted for, well, for being Microsoft.

Fuck it, let's not play any videogames at all. Let's just boycott everybody except Valve because they're about the only developer on Earth that has never put out a bad game. 

its influenced by a wii game but it isnt on wii,thats why i hate ubi

Nope, got nothin' better to do right now.

The Haze review should be done by the weekend at the latest. 

I'm not doing any boycott right now, but you haven't done much other than state that it's your opinion that it's dumb. That only proves you feel that way. So you looked arrogant for presenting it as not only fact, but us being dumb because you didn't agree with us.

Well, boycotts in general are pretty dumb. Boycotts over non-harmful business decisions are double dumb.

Wii owners want core games from Ubi. Got it. What happens if Ubi provides Wii owners with good games? Does the boycott end or does it continue to be spiteful?

And if it does end, what exactly was the point of it in the first place? That people didn't buy games they didn't want and called it a boycott? I don't buy things I don't want on a daily basis. I guess I must be boycotting 99.99% of the world's products.

Not to mention the fact that Wii owners don't know whether Ubi is working on 15 core games for the Wii or not as I type this. It's a big uproar, leading to a "boycott", all over a bunch of non-announcements.

1. Well if it wastes people's money, they could see it as a kind of harm of a sort. Whatever. 

2. It would end. Any further would be counterproductive. It would make the boycotters look like liars. And brute wouldn't be one of them. Brute just stated it would take more than just one or two games.

3. A proper boycott would be any Ubisoft developed game (which means NMH is fine, since Grasshopper supported the Wii), regardless of system. 

4. Some actually stated they would be fine with Ubisoft as they did that. How does that excuse using one of their key presentation events to show almost nothing but shovelware for the Wii (except for maybe RRR3)?

5. Didn't I just state that it was more than just the lack of announcements? Did you just ignore that part?  Even if you don't agree with the boycott, you can't just pretend there was one reason for the boycott. I stated three, that most of us were upset about.

I don't care if you don't agree with us, but don't twist facts to make our grievances less than they actually are. 

Grievances? Oy. Okay, on that note, I'm done with this thread. I no longer find it amusing.

Feel free to continue flailing your arms about and gnashing your teeth over this non-issue. I'll be elsewhere.

i wonder if ubis next couple of games will sell or bomb?