I'm fully aware of that but regardless , that is my opinion.

Looks like a job for High Voltage!

Seriously, they've gotten a lot of props from me for taking the time to actually try with the Wii. I expect that after the Conduit Engine (or whatever they call it) becomes commercially available to other developers, quality of Wii games will explode. We'll see tons of quality realistic-looking first- and third-person games come out of the woodwork. I'm eager to see what happens.

Only problem is that the publisher that helps fund the rest of High Voltage's work may try controlling what happens with that engine, in which case we'd better hope it's a quality publisher.

I'd argue, but I notice you didn't really clarify what you meant by decreasing quality. You can't mean making the game worse. That is slapping subjective opinion on objective sales. Do you mean budget and effort? That is likely what you meant, but it's still false.

Table Tennis is a good examples. The budget and effort was severly reduced, and the game sold about 1/7 of the 360 version. That is a significant amount of copies sold being lost.

Or contrast with the million sellers, the actual hits. The closest that even comes close to shovelware is Wii Play or Carnival Games. Two games out of 25. The next closest is Lego Star Wars, but only because it's basically two completed games. Yet those games themselves weren't shovelware.

So your main point seems to be that Ubisoft can and should do this because shovelware sells on the Wii, yet when I look at sales charts I don't see that. I see games with effort selling more, even if those games don't please reviewers.

So I think your argument is faulty, because it's based on a false premise. 

That could be a way Ubisoft gets back on our good graces. The publish the game, offer great marketing for it (ads on TV, for one, on channels people actually watch), state the game will be exactly as HV intends, and then state the engine will be used to make high budget Wii games at low budget prices. 

The only game that i can think of in the forseeable future as a good game and should probally be advertised a little will be the new FF:CC

@picko - I do understand your point and I was addressing it in a different manner. The "casual" crowd doesn't go out and buy many games. They are happy with Wii Sports, Wii Play, Carnival Games, Raving Rabbids and Wii Fit. THey probably will go out and get Mario Kart also. Putting out clones of these games and other mini games is a well that dries up quickly. 3rd party developers will find that harsh reality soon enough. They need to start making gateway games - games that take those casual gamers and start challenging them a little more, bringing them to the more serious game level. Some already have advanced, playing Mario Galaxy and whatnot. This is a big step from just bowling for 10 minutes into playing out a full game.

If a developer puts out a full AAA title, they'll put out a million or so copies. Considering that Wii games take an average of 5 million to make on the high end, a good AAA title would stand to make that developer around 20 mil+. Compare that to the average PETZ game, which might take a mil or 2 to make, but only sells 100k. They might make 2 mil plus, thus barely breaking even.

So the point is, there is a great reason to develop AAA games on the Wii - profit.

I'd like to note, that I was the first person who spazzed out to the entire Ubisoft thing on the Wii before there was an ubisoft thing, in fact I'd like to note that a guy who works at nintendo store warned me about ubisoft. I didn't listen to him got the PoP and cried myself to sleep.

PoP = The Club (quick relation for you Ps3 guys)

To prove it I rated Alien Syndrome on gamefaqs (4/10) and mentioned ubisoft is dead to me.

XD I'm slowly learning that the only developer to buy from is Nintendo and Capcom.

From what im seeing developers are ignoring the core fanbase on the wii and only focusing on the casual audience. Its good that these develoepers are making titles for the casual demographic they just cant ignore the core base or they will lose respect/faith from gamers, the masses and also potential profit. Just because the wii is so cheap for making software doesnt mean you cant fork over some money to make a good game. It dissapoints me to see games like RE4 and Star Wars Rogue Squadron looking better than any of these third party wii titles.

Or Twilight Princess, which was actually criticized for not having the graphics updated on the Wii version. 

TP really did look amazing from time to time, but the game was just epic over all, I only wish I wasn't forced to use the world from time to time, but later on the wolf is cool too... wish it ran faster.