By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Gears of War: Details and Disappointments

selnor said:
gengka said:
i just watched the 1st 13 minutes gameplay of mgs4 before i view the gears of war2 new gameplay trailer.

well, if i didnt watch mgs4 1st, i will say GOW2's graphic is really awesome.

so now i can only say "not bad" to gears of war2.

AND U KNOW HOW FREAKING AWESOME MGS4 IS!
You obviously didnt read this thread. GOW2 trailer was running on GOW1 engine. Wait till it's in UE3.5. 

 


DAMAGE CONTROL ER WA ER WA ER WA ER WA < alarm sounding.

You obviously didnt read the thread because the journalist is speculating that it is on the old engine.



Around the Network

So the game play trailer is Gears 2 running on UE3?
I think i'm confused, it looked good enough to me already!




^^No, the trailer was from UE2, which the original Gears ran on. Unreal Tournament used UE3, and now Gears 2 will use 'UE3.5'



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."
ToastyJaguar said:
So the game play trailer is Gears 2 running on UE3?
I think i'm confused, it looked good enough to me already!

What I gathered from the article was. (And I'm looking at it through this guys eyes)

"Aw man I wanted GeoW2 to blow everything out of the water. This isn't up to my expectations. I am going to obsess over it.... Wait... Whats this? NO SCAR!!! THIS MUST MEAN THAT THERE ISNT THAT MUCH DETAIL IN THESE GRAPHICS WHICH OBVIOUSLY MEANS THIS IS AN OLD ENGINE!!!!!!!"

see how people jump to conclusions?



@Thekitchensink

NO, GEOW 1 ran on UE 3....it was their "main" show off for the engine

@TotastJaguar

that is pure speculation at this point



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Around the Network
PooperScooper said:
ToastyJaguar said:
So the game play trailer is Gears 2 running on UE3?
I think i'm confused, it looked good enough to me already!

What I gathered from the article was. (And I'm looking at it through this guys eyes)

"Aw man I wanted GeoW2 to blow everything out of the water. This isn't up to my expectations. I am going to obsess over it.... Wait... Whats this? NO SCAR!!! THIS MUST MEAN THAT THERE ISNT THAT MUCH DETAIL IN THESE GRAPHICS WHICH OBVIOUSLY MEANS THIS IS AN OLD ENGINE!!!!!!!"

see how people jump to conclusions?

 Yes but No scar on Fenix face in the trailer is a well spotted piece of evidence that the trailer isnt just not quite there but quite away from the finished product. 

 



Are people really expecting that huge of a leap between these graphics?

I can see them being more polished and such but a huge leap?



The most effective way to bash a console is to pretend that you like it, but then sneak in a negative tone, language and arguments. That way you lure the reader into thinking you are presenting valid arguments. Also, it makes it harder for chritics to just dismiss you as a fanboy.

So lets examine this post, the methods of trying to create a negative aura around a game coming to the X360:

The thread title, very negative:
"Gears of War: Details and disappointments"

This line makes it sound like the graphics quality of the game remains an enigma:
"The moral of the story is that we wait and watch till E3 2008 when CliffyB will showcase a brand new gameplay trailer with a much updated engine, but until then, we can wonder…"


He is trying to steer the following discussion into questioning the game's GOTY status:
"YOUr thoughts.....will GEOW 2 NOT take away the GOTY 08 awards anymore?"

And in the same sub-forum he has a thread with this blatant title (the main competitor to GoW2):
"MGS4 = Gone Gold Ceremony! [MUST READ] --- GOTY 08 NO DOUBTS!!!"



selnor said:
PooperScooper said:
ToastyJaguar said:
So the game play trailer is Gears 2 running on UE3?
I think i'm confused, it looked good enough to me already!

What I gathered from the article was. (And I'm looking at it through this guys eyes)

"Aw man I wanted GeoW2 to blow everything out of the water. This isn't up to my expectations. I am going to obsess over it.... Wait... Whats this? NO SCAR!!! THIS MUST MEAN THAT THERE ISNT THAT MUCH DETAIL IN THESE GRAPHICS WHICH OBVIOUSLY MEANS THIS IS AN OLD ENGINE!!!!!!!"

see how people jump to conclusions?

 Yes but No scar on Fenix face in the trailer is a well spotted piece of evidence that the trailer isnt just not quite there but quite away from the finished product. 

 


lol!!! or its before he got the scar. NOW YOUR SPECULATING ON SPECULATION! I love how rumors get started.



PooperScooper said:
selnor said:
PooperScooper said:
ToastyJaguar said:
So the game play trailer is Gears 2 running on UE3?
I think i'm confused, it looked good enough to me already!

What I gathered from the article was. (And I'm looking at it through this guys eyes)

"Aw man I wanted GeoW2 to blow everything out of the water. This isn't up to my expectations. I am going to obsess over it.... Wait... Whats this? NO SCAR!!! THIS MUST MEAN THAT THERE ISNT THAT MUCH DETAIL IN THESE GRAPHICS WHICH OBVIOUSLY MEANS THIS IS AN OLD ENGINE!!!!!!!"

see how people jump to conclusions?

Yes but No scar on Fenix face in the trailer is a well spotted piece of evidence that the trailer isnt just not quite there but quite away from the finished product.

 


lol!!! or its before he got the scar. NOW YOUR SPECULATING ON SPECULATION! I love how rumors get started.

We know Gears 2 is set after Gears 1 it's not a prequal. And also why would Epic say Gears 2 is the first game to utilise UE3.5. and then not use the effects form UE3.5. Watch the trailer again. The OP has noticed all this well.