*ladidadida-HEXEN-lalal*
| Soriku said: He doesn't say he wants one. He says he proposed one before. But if it went through, the Zelda series would be dead as we know it. Link x Gun should not mix. |
LMAO, I don't think he was talking about Link carrying a GAT.
Jaos said:
You might consider that not everyone aches for FPS. To me that's about the most boring genre out there. But I do love Zelda. You might not understand that, but whatever... |
I understand it perfectly...and as article stated, they are not making a zelda FPS but were thinking about making one before so you have nothing to worry about.
You don't understand that if it became a FP(doesnt have to be S) game it would still be Zelda. It wouldn't be Halo or Doom... It would still be an awesome adventure game you love but would give a new perspective and new style of gameplay.
I like old zeldas but the last 4 were the same game...sure Majora's mask introduced timed quests in the the mix and Windwaker was cell shaded with anoying boat musical sections and there was a wolf gameplay in Twighlight Princes...but they play the same, sound the same and have the same tone.
If it became a FPS game and you played it you'd most likely like it. Then you may give other good FPS games a fair shake and might finally get why they kick ass. This is called gaming growth...
The article never said he was going to make Zelda OOT an FPS, it says he was going to make it "first person perspective"
Would you call oblivion an FPS? Because I think that's kind of the idea he was going for.
Help! I'm stuck in a forum signature!
disolitude said:
Honestly if the next zelda is the same gameplay idea behind the last 4 games...I think most people will wish it were a FPS. Howmany caves are there left to explore? |
A hell of a lot more then new ways of shooting people with impossible weapons 
If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing
(mostly)
And shepherds we shall be,
For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints
| disolitude said: I understand it perfectly...and as article stated, they are not making a zelda FPS but were thinking about making one before so you have nothing to worry about. You don't understand that if it became a FP(doesnt have to be S) game it would still be Zelda. It wouldn't be Halo or Doom... It would still be an awesome adventure game you love but would give a new perspective and new style of gameplay. I like old zeldas but the last 4 were the same game...sure Majora's mask introduced timed quests in the the mix and Windwaker was cell shaded with anoying boat musical sections and there was a wolf gameplay in Twighlight Princes...but they play the same, sound the same and have the same tone. If it became a FPS game and you played it you'd most likely like it. Then you may give other good FPS games a fair shake and might finally get why they kick ass. This is called gaming growth... |
What I like most about Zelda is the gameplay, and that includes 3rd person perspective. Making it a FPS would change gameplay very much. As a lot of people said about Metroid Prime, it's like they made a Zelda FPS, but with other story and characters (I don't mind). I played it, because I thought I could like it, but I didn't enjoy it, although it's a Nintendo game and I'm a big Nintendo fanboy. It showed me that I still won't like FPS games (tried them out about 10 years ago, don't know, I think counterstrike).
I'm glad Zelda will stay 3rd person, it really wouldn't be the same game if it changed perspective.