By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Is GTA IV being hailed because its not Nintendo

hunter_alien on 30 April 2008

lol , one of the biggest games of all is not on a Nintendo system and thats why its getting high grades ? lol , yet another great joke for my day :)



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!

Around the Network
NJ5 on 30 April 2008
hunter_alien said:
lol , one of the biggest games of all is not on a Nintendo system and thats why its getting high grades ? lol , yet another great joke for my day :)

 Just what we needed, someone oversimplifying the matter at hand in order to make it seem like people are more biased than they are.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

mrstickball on 30 April 2008

Mike, have you played GTAIV yet?



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

Stever89 on 30 April 2008

Jeez people. Give credit where credit is due. Anyway, Nintendo has been getting lazy, they haven't had a game that's topped OoT, and it's been nearly, what, 10 years? Now that someone finally came along and made a game that's better Nintendo's best, they'll have to step up their game a bit. I bet Disaster will be that game.



.:Dark Prince:. on 30 April 2008

@Stever89

Disaster? Seriously? I think Disaster won't even reach 80 on GR.



 

Around the Network
Stever89 on 30 April 2008

I picked that game because it's really the only game that I know Nintendo is releasing in the next 6 months (that I can think of anyway...), and since it should be more of a traditional/hardcore game, with a darker story, and pretty good graphics (for a Wii game of course), along with great controls (since Nintendo will nail them, no doubt), that it has a shot at getting a good score, but yeah, probably not enough to beat OoT or GTA4. I wasn't being completely serious anyway, since I hardly think Nintendo's been slacking it the last 10 years, with SMG only .2% away from beating OoT and Brawl getting a 95% or so on gamerankings.



LordTheNightKnight on 30 April 2008
Stever89 said:
Jeez people. Give credit where credit is due. Anyway, Nintendo has been getting lazy, they haven't had a game that's topped OoT, and it's been nearly, what, 10 years? Now that someone finally came along and made a game that's better Nintendo's best, they'll have to step up their game a bit. I bet Disaster will be that game.

Now this is total BS. Review points don't prove a company is lazy. What a crock.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Onyxmeth on 30 April 2008
amp316 said:
10 out of 10 means it's perfect. I haven't played it but that seems a bit awkward that it's getting 10's everywhere. I'm sure that it's a phenomenal game like all of the GTA games are if you into them. I personally get bored of jacking cars and killling innocent people. What I'm saying is this, if it would have normally gotten a 9.5 they bumped it up to 10 because they know that the Wii is destroying the other two consoles. Yes, I'm saying conspiracy, but only slightly. It legitimately I'm sure is a great game, but so is Mario Kart Wii which isn't exactly seeing tens or even nines is it? See? Conspiracy. Also, please stop refering to it as the greatest game of all time. Have you played through all 100+ hours of it? If you haven't, then you cannot back up that claim and one more thing... conspiracy.
So if people haven't played 100+ through the game they can't call it the greatest of all time, but even though you haven't played it you can label the high scores a conspiracy? Huh? What?

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



LordTheNightKnight on 30 April 2008

Okay, the high scores is not the conspiracy against Nintendo. The conspiracy is to shut down the usual contrary reviews, that usually happen with these games, in order to spite Nintendo.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Stever89 on 30 April 2008
LordTheNightKnight said:
Stever89 said:
Jeez people. Give credit where credit is due. Anyway, Nintendo has been getting lazy, they haven't had a game that's topped OoT, and it's been nearly, what, 10 years? Now that someone finally came along and made a game that's better Nintendo's best, they'll have to step up their game a bit. I bet Disaster will be that game.

Now this is total BS. Review points don't prove a company is lazy. What a crock.


lol. I think I was just burned.

That's why it was sarcasm. I probably should have labeled it.