It's funny that they came to that conclusion, because I came to the opposite conclusion. Now, I'm basing my conclusion on the video you have linked.

0:25 - You can see a light pole underneath the arch. On the XBox360, it looks like it disappears completely from view, indicating poor anti-aliasing. On the PS3, it flickers in and out of view.  This also indicates poor/low levels of anti-aliasing, but at least the pole is being picked up.

0:30 - Look at the closest building in the background. Notice the ledge circling around the right of the building. Notice the jaggies on the XBox360 version? Notice the relatively smooth looking PS3 version?

1:50 - The sidewalk on the left and right look noticably smoother on the PS3 version driveby.

Those are the differences that stood out most to me, in terms of aliasing issues (I stopped watching the video after the sidewalk scene). The PS3 version clearly has fewer aliasing issues than the XBox360 version, based on this video. It amazes me that they came to their "the PS3 game clearly features more aliasing issues and a general roughness." They are spot on about the XBox360 version looking sharper though.

I own the PS3 version. And the game looks blurry, for lack of a better word. I haven't had a chance to check out the XBox360 version, but I'm anxious to see what differences I'll be able to spot in the actual game, on actual TVs, instead of checking random comparison videos that aren't even in HD.

Why not compare the game models? You know, the people, cars, and other objects? Or are they so close, they can't really fuel any fanboy debate?

The natural resolution of the PS3 is 630p.
The natural resolution of the 360 is 720p.
Both 360 and PS3 can be upscaled to play in 1080p true HD resolution.

And the 360 has yet one more foot up on the PS3 version, lol. True or not this is hillarious. It's funny watching all the Sony Gamers who would have trumped this up as Mana from God had it been announced vice versa in favor of the PS3 are now trying to play it down.

Oh, somehow I doubt this will affect sales, everyone can calmn down.

Its because resolution doesn't soley determine how good a game looks.  I could play a game on my PC at very high resolution but with a lot of additional effects turned off... or play it at a lower resolution with all those effects on - guess which one looks better?

The reviews seem to be pretty much in agreement that the PS3 'looks' better due to 'slightly' better lighting, pos-processing effects, and so on - the resolution difference is not enough to make much difference and it would appear the 360 does not have quite as nice lighting, etc.  Also the HDD load on the PS3 is reducing pop-in and texture load times it would appear, which also contributes to the game looking better.

I've seen the game on both systems now and really the difference is not much.  The PS3 is def the overall better looking version to the eye - but we're not compaing the Mona Lisa to a sketch by a two year old, we're comparing two almost identical paintings with one being slightly better lit for viewing.

If you have 360 you've still got a good game (and the DLC if you buy it).  If you have a PS3 you have the same good game with a little extra sprinkle of chocolate on top (and maybe different DLC at some point, maybe not).

I say call it a draw and be happy.  I am.

Only now that it is confirmed the PS3 doesn't have the "numbers" edge in graphical advantages that people finally admit that Resolution isn't everything. Hasn't this been what we've been telling you from day one? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!

The biggest problem is that no one realised. so all those giving shit about the ps3 version should shut up cause you couldn't tell from hte beginning anyway LOL.