@cklmb
+ you have ****FREE*** online
| darthdevidem01 said: @cklmb + you have ****FREE*** online |
That doesn't really matter because ck is already paying for Live gold.
Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/
BCNR34 said:
they even mention in the article its not perfect, and the reason they still gave it a perfect score:
Grand Theft Auto III was a revolutionary title, one that inspired a whole new generation of 3D action games. Grand Theft Auto IV is just as big a leap forward, though perhaps in subtler ways, and sets a new benchmark for open-world games. Everything in GTA IV works in harmony. The story would be nothing without the city; the city gains realism from the physics engine; the physics compliment the improved AI; the AI would make no sense without the new cover system. And on and on. There is no one major weak aspect. A "10" is not a score we give out very often. In fact, the last time we gave a 10 to a console game was Soul Calibur in 1999. A 10 doesn't mean a game is perfect -- it means a game is pushing boundaries, expanding a genre, and doing many things to a level so far above and beyond its competitors that they overshadows any flaws. Certainly, GTA IV has some issues, the most noticeable being the occasional flaw in the cover system, but there are many more pieces of GTA IV that are better than anything I've seen from a game in the past decade. We don't give 10s often -- just to games that merit the score.
|
If those were the justification to give 10/10, which by definition is 100%, then Galaxy should deserve the same score, it DID push boundaries, expanding genre and did everything a Mario game should do to a system.
And yet, that game didn't get a 10.
I don't care what their explanation is, it just seems like a weak justification for somewhat obvious "shock" score.
Soriku (Feb 10/08): In 5 years the PS3/360 will be dead.
KH3 bet: "If KH3 comes to Wii exclusive, I will take a 1 month of sig/avatar by otheres open a thread apologize and praise you guys' brilliance." http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?start=50&id=18379
Original cast: Badonkadonkhr, sc94597 allaboutthegames885, kingofwale, Soriku, ctk495, skeezer, RDBRaptor, Mirson,
I'll be damned- the PS3 version is 100% officially better! I think PS3 owners should be allowed to boast about this, seeing as the other version gets the DLC.
| rocketpig said: "The story is Oscar quality." Am I the only one who giggled when they read this? I'm having a tough time swallowing the rest of the review after that line. |
Lets remember its a different part of the staff who review movies.
10/10 though holy crap
This game is going to explode to epic porportion
 | "Back off, man. I'm a scientist." Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked. | |
this thread needs more starcraft/madskillz. can't wait to see how they spin the superior ps3 version.
| BCNR34 said: this thread needs more starcraft/ |
Lulz, and fix'd.
I finished the review and damn I nearly pissed my pants. This is definately going to be the game that gets me into online multiplayer. The sound of free mode just makes me shiver.
Also, I am glad I got the PS3 Limited Edition I can easily see this being game of the year if not this generation.
@Kratos, Sorry I was hounding IGN all day for the update but I didn't think the review would be out this early.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
