UK Supreme Court rules the definition of a woman is based on biological sex

bdbdbd

Currently Offline

23,698

5780 posts since 21/02/07

Recent Badges:

Making Friends 10 friends on gamrConnect.
18 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 18 years.
Man or Robot? Managed to avoid being banned for 10 years.
A Badge Within A Badge Earned 20 badges.
Vice Free Managed to avoid being banned for 6 months.
So You Came Back For More, Huh? Logged in a second time.

bdbdbd on 18 April 2025

Jumpin said:

I'm wondering what the benefits of this could possibly be?
Because, it's not like anyone has to adhere to their language, and it doesn't seem to be enforceable - because if they try to enforce it, they'll be pressured to overturn it on grounds of discrimination.

It doesn't seem that this anything more than a big discriminatory virtue signal to please stupid people. They're stupid because the people pleased about this gain nothing, and yet are often passionate about harming others and will dedicate energy to do so with no personal gain for them or anyone really.

So, my take on this is pointless agitation, and ultimately nothing more than a virtue signal against a culture of freedom and liberty.

It was because of the women's protection act that protects women in public spaces. This means that you can't go around the law by pretending to be a woman and this way women to lose their protection that the specific law is made for.

One might argue whether the act itself is discriminatory, but this isn't for the court to decide.

Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.

sundin13

Currently Online

25,430

6538 posts since 09/04/12

Recent Badges:

12 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 12 years.
Haunted Logged in on Halloween.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.
A Civilized Man Managed to avoid being banned for 5 years.
Man or Robot? Managed to avoid being banned for 10 years.
Open For Business Earned 10 badges.

sundin13 on 18 April 2025

This basically gives free reign to allow the exclusion of trans women from female spaces, which I maintain is and has always been bad policy when applied with a broad brush. Nuance should be the standard with these discussions as they require the balancing of rights and protections for all relevant parties.