killeryoshis said: Did tastes change? The original Xenoblade X had a lower average score. Normally, ports get lower scores, but this game is nearly ten years old now! |
I felt it was criminally underrated on the Wii U.
I didn't pay much attention to the critics, but there were a ton of dishonest and unfair criticisms of the first release by players. So much dismissal of its achievements as well. If you go back 8 or 9 years, you can probably find my posts praising this game being attacked by numerous trolls on this forum. But over time the trolls went away, and the game is still great.
The game was phenomenal and groundbreaking at the time, and remains great to this day. I do hope more people play it, and not just those of us who enjoyed it the first time around.
Just to point out how fucking huge the world is. The entire Toussaint map in Witcher 3: Blood and Wine amounts to under 8 square kilometers. Xenoblade Chronicles X is 400 square kilometers, and the world has a lot of vertical map-space too, different layers.
The story was criticized a lot, but I found a city from earth, plunked down on an alien planet, forced to survive, then thrive, and incorporate the natives and other species into the city, as being one of the most interesting stories I've come across in gaming. It's not merely a character driven story, it's a city driven story with over a dozen primary characters and hundreds of secondary characters that help shape the personality and direction of that city. It's also Nintendo's first truly open world RPG, and they slammed it out of the park.
Another thing I really like about it is the size of the city and the types of technology are reminiscent of Xenogears and Xenosaga.
And some of these landscapes are as beautiful as they are huge:
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.