I had never argued that "the betting firms were wrong", only that there's room for them to have been wrong. Just like there's room for polls and vibes to be wrong, and here we are.
I had never argued that "the betting firms were wrong", only that there's room for them to have been wrong. Just like there's room for polls and vibes to be wrong, and here we are.
Chrkeller said:
Yeah, I am owed an apology. I told you, and many others, betting firms were not stupid. I told you liberals didn't have middle america appeal. I was mocked and questioned by people who ZERO US experience. I was right, eat your crow.  |
you said betting firms were right because they have money behind their projections, others showed you they've been wrong in the past so your simplistic model of "the betting firms have to be right because there's money on the line" was wrong. Am I forgetting something?
...
Ryuu96 said: He probably won't because he didn't fix it the first time around but this time he is hinting he will be a lot more fascist about it like bringing up the Aliens Enemy Act which was used to put Japanese-Americans in concentration camps. But then again, it's the common thing with right wing parties, they'll scream about the border/immigration then do nothing about it when they get into power, sometimes, it gets even worse, Lmao. I think it's because they don't want to fix it, they know it's their best way into power, giving people a common enemy is very effective and pinning all of a countries problems on that enemy is also very effective to distract people from other issues. Not to say uncontrolled migration doesn't have its own problems but it's often used to cover up many other problems caused by governments themselves, or rich people. I think Shapiro is the clear leader, he is basically Obama but white, the safest choice with little baggage, aside from his previous comments on Israel/Gaza but in about 4 years from now, sadly, Gaza won't exist. Trump won't be running in 28 and Republicans will have difficulty finding someone with his charisma. |
“Gaza won’t exist”, sad but true. Man, the gloom in the air is so hard to ignore. Europe better wake up…
And Ryuu, I am not an alarmist, as I said, I wasn’t freaking out in 2016 or in 2020, but this time around I don’t know about the 4 year thing anymore… the world belongs to Trump, MBS, Putin( Erdogan… hard to imagine this is just another term and not a whole new era.
Torillian said:
you said betting firms were right because they have money behind their projections, others showed you they've been wrong in the past so your simplistic model of "the betting firms have to be right because there's money on the line" was wrong. Am I forgetting something? |
And also days before betting firms tightened the odds significantly and Chrkeller said he was happy to see that, Lol.
In the end betting firms basically said what a lot of people were saying, it would be a tight race that Trump could win.
the-pi-guy said: I had never argued that "the betting firms were wrong", only that there's room for them to have been wrong. Just like there's room for polls and vibes to be wrong, and here we are. |
You're also American, not European.
I want to know who these Europeans are that Chrkeller has an issue with aside from me.
Devastating, but not entirely surprising. First and foremost the people to blame and point fingers at are those voting for Trump, they are the ones who decided to support the insanity.
There are a number of things democrats could have handled better. I think their campaign has for the most part been good, and all data I have seen suggests Kamala was as strong a candidate as anybody. She united the party in record time, came off as likeable and caring. Sure she might have had some wacky views in 2019-2020, but did anyone really believe they weren't just pandering? What the campaign failed to do was deliver something for male, especially young male voters. This has been a headache for the left in the west for a decade now, that the feminists and the so-called 'woke' have not managed to find a strong motivating message for male voters.
Besides that, I think the campaign was strong. Hence Harris' major problem lies in the governing of Biden. The handling of the border has frankly been a disaster, they started the term appealing to the far left on this issue, then way too late they realized this is a major issue for the average American. The fentanyl crisis and Afghanistan withdrawals were problematic too, but I doubt it made a big difference in the election outcome. The economy probably did make a difference, even though Biden didn't really do any significant mistakes here, the inflation would have gone up no matter what he had done.
Anyway all this combined could definitely explain a Harris loss, but to a standard republican, not a radicalized MAGA lunatic. Had she and Biden done everything right, Trump would still be looking at 45 % of the votes.
So there is the main problem - the MAGA movement is fundamentally a dishonest political movement, not motivated by any real political ideas or visions, but feelings of anger, fear, paranoia and pride. It is a movement that is not actually explaining honestly what their issues are and what they believe would solve them (if they even agree on any of that), hence it is absolutely impossible to address with rational political solutions.
There are no real solutions to that, which are possible within the American system.
Europe is on a similar trajectory, but at least here the path is not set in stone. Politicians need to focus on solving some of the driving factors: increase manufacturing jobs, shut down the option for spontaneous assylum to avoid huge and fast demographic changes, facilitate the distribution of wealth, heavily regulate social media platforms, or even better- abolish them completely. Same with the use of artificial intelligence. Europe should also invest in military to defend itself, and unfortunately this includes getting substantially more nuclear weapons. This all seems very dark, but unfortunately it is not about making the World a better place anymore, but saving Europe from fascism, which is all we can hope for now.
Let us review what we learned:
1) Liberals have terrible strategy and implementation
2) Liberals do not connect with middle America
3) Running an administration, or someone tied to it, with a 60% disapproval rating was stupid
4) Special interest doesn't resonant, big-ticket items such as economy and border matter
5) Polls do in fact underestimate Trump
6) Betting Firms are trustworthy and know their stuff
I think that covers it. Anybody who wants to know who said what, can re-read the thread. Otherwise, enjoy the rest of your day.
Edit
Oh and I forgot the add number 7:
7) This wasn't a tight election, Trump won with ease (e.g. plenty of room to spare)
i7-13700k |
Vengeance 32 gb |
RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC |
Switch OLED
Well the stupid people won. Not surprising, most of us here in ‘murica are stupid. Let’s hope the GOP doesn’t do too much damage in the four years Trump has left.
I hope they take the house, too, so there can be no excuses about what he does and doesn’t do.
Chrkeller said: Let us review what we learned: Edit Oh and I forgot the add number 7: 7) This wasn't a tight election, Trump won with ease (e.g. plenty of room to spare) |
8) Republicans are okay with a xenophobic felon as long as he promises them unattainable economic strategies and that he'll deport all the illegals.
...