By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Console Graphical Power Ranking

haxxiy said:
Zedex said:

Nevermind its already been done:

You've just summoned Pemalite with that image. Brace for impact.

That being said, I'll already come out and tell you FLOPS is a poor way of comparing graphics hardware, especially across multiple architectures spanning decades, some of which did raster in a completely different way (PS2, DS and earlier).

I admit you cant compare flops. But in this case and judging from everyones opinion and my own so far in this thread. That chart got it right.

Its pretty much how i would place the consoles on power levels.



Around the Network
Bofferbrauer2 said:
zorg1000 said:

None of this makes sense to me, can someone translate this into DBZ power levels?

Xbox Series X: Ultra Instinct

PS5: Super Sayian Blue + Kaioken

Xbox One X: Super Sayan Blue

PS4 Pro: Golden Freeza

Xbox Series S: Super Sayian God (Red)

PS4: Super Sayian Broly

Xbox One: Super Sayian 4

Switch: Super Sayian Vegito

WiiU: Super Sayian Gogeta

PS3: Super Sayian 2 Vegeta

Xbox 360: Super Sayian 2 Goku

PS Vita Super Sayian

Wii: C17

3DS: Freeza

Xbox: Piccolo

Gamecube: Trunks

PS2: Great Sayiaman

Dreamcast: Tenshinhan

PSP: Krillin

DS: Kaioken

N64: Master Kaio

Saturn: Over 9000!

PS1: Nappa

SNES:Muten Roshi

Genesis: Saibaiman

Gameboy Advance: Yamcha

Game Gear: Radditz

Gameboy Color: Yajirobi

Master System: Tao Pai Pai

NES: ChiChi

Gameboy: Hercule Satan

Atari 2600: Bulma

Ok this was fricken great lol -D .



zero129 said:
haxxiy said:

You've just summoned Pemalite with that image. Brace for impact.

That being said, I'll already come out and tell you FLOPS is a poor way of comparing graphics hardware, especially across multiple architectures spanning decades, some of which did raster in a completely different way (PS2, DS and earlier).

I admit you cant compare flops. But in this case and judging from everyones opinion and my own so far in this thread. That chart got it right.

Its pretty much how i would place the consoles on power levels.

The thing with FLOPS is that it's theoretical peak performance, not necessarily real world performance in actual games, as it doesn't take into account every component and bottleneck in the hardware.

Xbox Series S and PS4 Pro may have similar FLOPS with a slight lead for the Pro, but the Series S has a much stronger CPU and an SSD so it's more capable overall.



Pemalite said:
zeldaring said:

Not really. on paper it looks better but on paper never tells the whole story. ps5 has a few advantages like The PS5's rasterization performance that makes them about equal.  

Xbox Series X has better rasterization performance, thanks to 20% higher integer and floating point performance.
Combine that with higher pixel, texel, geometry, texture fillrate and higher memory bandwidth... It's a no brainer that the Series X has the edge.

So what you have stated is blatantly false.

The only real advantage the Playstation 5 has is SSD performance.

But honestly, the performance delta is pretty much irrelevant between the two, most games push for parity anyway.

From what I recall the PS5 has a few GPU advantages due to being clocked 20% higher. 

Most of those advantages are probably meaningless in practice. XSX still has the more meaningful advantages.

Last edited by the-pi-guy - on 21 October 2023

SNES should be number 1



Around the Network

That chart is off as well; Switch is 393 GFLOPS in docked mode and depending on the clock speed used (it's up to the dev to choose) between 157 and 236 GFLOPS in portable mode.

If FLOPS were the be-all end-all, that would mean Switch in portable mode even at max clocks is weaker than the Xbox 360, yet that's evidently not the case as Switch in portable mode runs many 7th gen titles at higher settings than the 360, plus games beyond the reach of 360 like Witcher 3, Dying Light, Bright Memory Infinite, Hellblade, Doom Eternal, etc.