zorg1000 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Nah, it isn't about a "gotcha" nor a distinction. Games get bundled (official or otherwise) and shouldn't be used as a means to downplay anything, particularly as one cannot separate a bundled sale from a non-bundled sale. It's a tired argument that has proven to be nothing but gasoline on a fire and that's what we're putting out before it gets going.
This is in addition to a documented history of similar behavior.
|
I agree that bundles shouldn’t be used to downplay a game’s sales as Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft would not bundle a game unless they thought it would help sell the console and the idea that Sony needs heavy bundling to get their games to 10 million is just flat out wrong.
However, I do believe there is a massive distinction between the type of bundle I described and the type of bundles in your links.
|
I get that there is a distinction ("official or otherwise"), and I understand that you are trying to make his points make sense in that regard (although a bundled sale is a bundled sale and the only real difference will be in amount sold per bundle, something that isn't distinguished in financials). The bigger problem is what has gone on for sometime and I can be fair to you on since you wouldn't have known that.
Still the bottom line is within your first set of sentences. All three companies bundle games with their systems, so there is no reason to leave an open door to narratives that pick and choose when those matter and when they don't. That's the jist of my input on that.
Last edited by CGI-Quality - on 17 February 2024