zeldaring said:
Chrkeller said:
I've owned every Nintendo home console ever made. Nintendo is my favorite and I play the switch more than the ps5. I'm just realistic about what mobile hardware will actually do. At the end of the day I've explained how you are wrong. So did ZeldaRing. And now Pemalite has as well. Your call on if you are going to continue the fool show. DLSS is a tool. It doesn't make weak hardware compete with high end. Performance is a balance of all hardware. Ps5 has upscaling tools available. Switch 2 isn't running with the series s, much less series x and ps5. End of story. |
yup here is GOW using FSR 2.0 upscaling PS5 secret sauce confirmed. I don't really understand why people making this a big deal out of this when every single PC gamer says its doesn't look great upscaling from low resolutions. judging off youtube videos is useless. |
I watched the video and the results are comparable, not identical but good enough.
Look at it this way. In once scene it guessed and added too much water reflections, however how would a general gamer know that it did that unless they had a PS5 version of the game and a Switch 2 version of the game side by side and stopped moving and compare pixel by pixel?
I'll use a TV show example, many people are mind blown by Buffy 1080p amazon cut for how great it looks, however for those who understand that the original source is 4:3, and they basically cut out a 16:9 image randomly from it and scaled it up, know there is information missing. However the general consumer just remembers watching buffy on VHS and blurry picture now its sharp and crisp but don't realised it is zoomed it and cropped out detail. To make things worse they didn't even reintroduce all the colour corrections to it that were done postprocessing so night scenes look almost daytime, but again the general consumer is none the wiser.
Back to your video.
In reality there is nothing wrong with the two FSR images unless you are comparing it to the native source. Ok so in one scene the dragon on the wooden box had less detail? big deal, most gamers don't stand around admiring the detail on a wooden box.
In the parts where he walked around, they looked comparable in motion and I be happy playing any of those 3 versions.
Now the reason PC gamers say it doesn't look great is because of something called consumer bias.
Think of it like chocolate, buy a $100 block vs a $5 block. If you know which cost what your brain will automatically bias you into thinking the $100 one tastes better. Same applies to graphics card. In my head I just spent $1500 bux on the latest and greatest, so in my head I'm like oh yer this is much better then upscaling on my old graphics card. Now in reality we know we have reached diminishing returns, so our brain tricks us into thinking it is much better because of the money we spent to justify the purchase in our head. Is the new card better? absolutely, but to say the old one using FSR isn't comparable is just fooling yourself as that video demonstrated how they all look about the same, especially in motion. The image may not be an accurate representation of the native image, but it has managed to construct something a general gamer woudl be happy with as they non the wiser.