By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

An estimated 30% to 40% fewer international students are expected on American college campuses in the fall of 2025, compared with trends in the 2024-2025 academic year, according to according to NAFSA: Association of International Educators – a nonprofit that focuses on international education – and JB International, a for-profit educational technology firm.

In total, an estimated 150,000 fewer international students were expected to arrive this fall, due to new visa restrictions and visa appointments being canceled at U.S. embassies and consulates in many countries, such as India, China, Nigeria and Japan. NAFSA and JB International are expected to release updated data on international student enrollment in November 2025.

There were over 1.1 million international students – more than half of whom were from China or India – on American college campuses in the 2023-2024 academic year, according to the Institute for International Education, which monitors foreign student programs and shares the most comprehensive available recent data.

This sharp drop in international students could cost the U.S. economy US$7 billion in the 2025-26 school year, according to estimates from NAFSA.

For every three international students in the U.S., one new American job is created or supported by the average $35,000 these students spend in their local communities on housing, food and transportation, and other costs.

As a senior fellow at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy in the Obama administration, I oversaw many of the student exchange programs involving multiple countries around the globe. I foresee a major economic crisis over international students that could last for years.

Fewer international students are coming to the US, costing universities and communities that benefit from these visitors

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 13 September 2025

Around the Network
TallSilhouette said:

I wonder how Tennessee Republicans will react. Will they suddenly have a problem with it now that the shoe is on the other foot or will they go

Shelby County, where Memphis is, is one of only three blue counties, with the others being Davidson County (Nashville) and Haywood County, which is near Memphis  



Ryuu96 said:

The UN General Assembly voted in favour of establishing a Palestinian state. The resolution, backed by 142 countries, calls for a two-state solution, a ceasefire in Gaza, release of hostages, Hamas disarmament, and regional security guarantees.

Israel voted against it, alongside nine other countries – Argentina, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Tonga and the United States – while 12 nations abstained.

Sounds great. How is this enforced?

iron_megalith said:
the-pi-guy said:

In what ways are you being forced to change your sandbox? 

No one is forcing you to be gay. No one is forcing you to be trans. 

No one is showing up at your house to show you gay porn. 

No one is showing up at your house to show you trans porn.

When you're doing things in a community, that is not your sandbox. 

If you're having a conversation about someone with someone else, that is not your sandbox. 

If you're a government official, it is not your sandbox to deny people rights that you don't like.  

If you're in the park, it is not your sandbox to tell other people how to engage in the park.  

When you're having a conversation with someone, that is not your sandbox. 

When you're online and engaging with other platforms and other people, that is not your sandbox.  

"where if I don't agree with their stupid preferred pronouns I am somehow an evil person that needs to be stripped of off my rights? Making existing characters gay to push an agenda? If I can make fun of staunch Christians and ignore them, then I can very well do the same to LGBT ideology." 

^ This isn't your sandbox, this is more like how your sandbox interacts with other people's.  

If you're a Christian who doesn't like how you're being treated, you're allowed to say that.

If you're a gay person who doesn't like how you're being treated, you're allowed to say that. 

One person's free speech can be used to be a jerk, and it is another's free speech for them to say that they're being a jerk. Otherwise you don't have free speech.  

Ah yes the no one is forcing you to be gay.... The common thing that gets said. Then why do we have so much corpo/government backing to pedal this shit even on things that didn't have it nor really were made for it? If you didn't think this was about control over the culture, then you are deluded.

Again, forcing inclusivity is retarded. Also trying to force acceptance means you have to strongarm people into agreement. You have to earn it if you want it. You are free to do so. But don't come crying to me if people push against it and you're forced to retreat back into your minority safe space. If you were able to exist without having that much eyes on you, then trying to make it "mainstream" was your own decision.

Also, the world is filled with jerks. The only time that it really matters to me is on extreme cases like when they try wish harm onto others. Someone calls me a f*gg*t? Fuck. I lost a second of my time reading that. Who the fuck is that guy anyway? A fucking nobody? Moving on.

Define force. Then explain what has been done to force you to accept anything.

Last edited by JWeinCom - on 13 September 2025

JWeinCom said:
Ryuu96 said:

The UN General Assembly voted in favour of establishing a Palestinian state. The resolution, backed by 142 countries, calls for a two-state solution, a ceasefire in Gaza, release of hostages, Hamas disarmament, and regional security guarantees.

Israel voted against it, alongside nine other countries – Argentina, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Tonga and the United States – while 12 nations abstained.

Sounds great. How is this enforced

It's the UN so it won't be enforced, the UN is toothless. But even still, it would be nice to see America on the right side of history, even if the resolution won't even do anything, they can't even be bothered to vote yes to some vague peace proposal.



JWeinCom said:
Ryuu96 said:

The UN General Assembly voted in favour of establishing a Palestinian state. The resolution, backed by 142 countries, calls for a two-state solution, a ceasefire in Gaza, release of hostages, Hamas disarmament, and regional security guarantees.

Israel voted against it, alongside nine other countries – Argentina, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Tonga and the United States – while 12 nations abstained.

Sounds great. How is this enforced?

Same as Apartheid in South Africa was tackled. Sanctions until Israel complies. But it will be on the member states to sanction Israel and so far it's mostly words.

UNGA can go to enforcement through the United for peace resolution 377A, to bypass UNSC vetoes.

https://www.un.org/en/ga/sessions/emergency.shtml

But again it will be on the member states to initiate the process.



It's looking more and more like military intervention is the only option to end the genocide. The little hope that is left is that Trump will finally say no to Netanyahu and will end military support. Yet even then Netanyahu can keep going and turn Israel into something like North Korea. And then be ignored just like North Korea. 2021 estimate for NK sites 300K to 350K deaths from famine...


It's looking grim for all Palestinians in the region, all words, no actions.



Around the Network

Oddly enough one of the biggest rifts between different MAGA groups happens to really be at odds over their opinion of Isreal and the Jewish community and its a pretty huge division.



CosmicSex said:

Oddly enough one of the biggest rifts between different MAGA groups happens to really be at odds over their opinion of Isreal and the Jewish community and its a pretty huge division.

What is it? "I hate Jews" vs "I hate Arabs?"



Ryuu96 said:
CosmicSex said:

Oddly enough one of the biggest rifts between different MAGA groups happens to really be at odds over their opinion of Isreal and the Jewish community and its a pretty huge division.

What is it? "I hate Jews" vs "I hate Arabs?"

No, oddly enough the pro Israel people probably are more antisemitic in general. Or maybe equally. 

There is a belief among evangelical Christians that For Jesus to return, the Jews must be in control of the holy land. Dunno enough about the scripture to understand why.

So even among people who generally hate Jews and blame them for at least 50% of society's ills, many are staunchly pro-Israel. And acting as though they support Jewish people in general is a way to make it seem rooted in some sort of kindness. Then of course, there are also those who see Israel as a check against the spread of Islam.

As for the pro-Palestinian contingent of the right wing, I don't think it has much to do with any objection to Israel's actions, but more about general isolationism. I have a feeling they would not complain as much if America wasn't funding it, but it's not objections to how Israel is using the funds as much as it is just money going out for any kind of foreign aid. Of course, fake sympathy will be displayed when useful.

Of course, another element of this is it's all a fucking game. They are competing for the same market, so you need to do something to distinguish yourself from others. Everyone needs to have a hook.

Last edited by JWeinCom - on 13 September 2025

Patel continues to be in way over his head.

Kash Patel plays a G-man on TV - Thr New Yorker 

“But Patel’s upbeat tone contrasted with frustration and anger, both inside and outside the FBI, over his handling of the most high-profile moment of his tenure so far. Some FBI employees told CNN they found it galling for Patel to claim personal credit for the most successful parts of the investigation.”

‘It’s unacceptable.” Inside growing concerns about Patel’s FBI leadership - CNN



SanAndreasX said:

Patel continues to be in way over his head.

Kash Patel plays a G-man on TV - Thr New Yorker 

“But Patel’s upbeat tone contrasted with frustration and anger, both inside and outside the FBI, over his handling of the most high-profile moment of his tenure so far. Some FBI employees told CNN they found it galling for Patel to claim personal credit for the most successful parts of the investigation.”

‘It’s unacceptable.” Inside growing concerns about Patel’s FBI leadership - CNN

At least he wasn't a DEI hire. He got his job the old fashioned way; by writing a kids book which depicted Trump as a king.