Depends on what you define as rich and what life style they choose to live. Someone who has 3 million dollars in net worth is consider rich to me. If they want to travel a lot and see the world they can. However, they will have to be careful not to overspend or else they will lose all of of their money. A rich billionaire life style might be an entrepreneur who wants to use their money to create new products, services and innovation. That requires a lot of money sometimes.

If you start taxing rich people a lot more they will find ways to recoup their loses. Usually at the cost of the middle class. People end up poor a lot because of their own doing majority of the time. They don't invest and pay off their debt. Then when something comes up like a layoff, they don't have any money and blame everyone else. Even though if they invest their money they would've been fine.

Teachers are a good example on how to become rich. Teachers may not get paid the most but are one of the demographics that become millionaires more frequent than any other profession. Because it is all about time and budgeting.

Not to mention if you tax too much you end up losing more tax revenue. For example, if you tax rich people a much higher rate then the billionaires will leave and stop investing in the United Staes. If you tax middle/poor class too much they will stop working because there will be no point in working.

I have never heard that about teachers and i am skeptical.  Do you have any sources for that?  Growing up in the USA i have always felt teachers were underpaid.  I always loop back to pro-athlete vs teachers wages and feel like we have things horribly bass-akwards when we pay entertainers so much better than those teachers helping shape our countries future.

That's why there has been so much anti-semitism.  The ashenkazi jews just soar above and beyond most people in Europe.  And the nazis wanted to punish the people that they knew were better than them.  You don't have to agree, and it's just my 2 cents.  Realize that Hitler was probably a malignant narcissist.  

On one hand they have the "look at me", "look at me" narcissist thing going on.  On the other, they have evil solutions that most narcissists wouldn't dream of.  That's why i think he devised the holocaust since the Jews were smarter and better than the Germans on average.  

The whole Planet of the Apes thing was a good analogy since it has two important things in common with the Palestenian and Jew situation.  Originally, the Jews were the Hebrew people.  And they came before the Palestenians.  The Jews are also smarter, and better than than the Palestenians.  They have been able to become much wealthier than not only the Palestenians, but the neighboring nations.    

That still has the same definition since 1951:

https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf

Article I
The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in
time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to
punish.

Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as
such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c ) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III
The following acts shall be punishable:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c ) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV
Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be
punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private
individuals.

And continued in the link

If anything Israel/Aipac try to change the definition of genocide to only be relevant after total extermination. 

I definitely do no agree with any of that.


https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/antisemitism-in-history-the-era-of-nationalism-1800-1918

The emancipation of the Jews enabled them to own land, enter the civil service, and serve as officers in the national armed forces. It created the impression for some others—particularly those who felt left behind, traumatized by change, or unable to achieve occupational satisfaction and economic security in accordance with their expectations—that Jews were displacing non-Jews in professions traditionally reserved for Christians. It also created for some the impression that at the same time, Jews were being overrepresented in future-oriented professions of the late nineteenth century: finance, banking, trade, industry, medicine, law, journalism, art, music, literature, and theater.

Sounds a lot like current Islamophobia in Europe, the immigrants are taking our jobs.

In summary, 18th-century antisemitism was a multifaceted phenomenon driven by religious prejudices, economic tensions, and evolving social and political contexts, with roots in the medieval past but taking on new forms in the Enlightenment era.

Hitler capitalized on existing anti-semitism to further his goals, just like Trump is using anti immigration sentiment to further his goals and Netanyahu is furthering anti Arab/Muslim sentiments for his. It's the same story as always.

https://www.annefrank.org/en/topics/antisemitism/why-did-hitler-hate-jews/



Originally both Jews and Palestinians were Caanites. In fact ME Jews and Palestinians share the same ancestry. Most that remained in the area, after the Roman invasion, converted to Islam which became the dominant religion in the Ottoman Empire.

However Jews and Muslims still lived peacefully together

While Islam was the dominant religion, the empire also included significant populations of Christians, Jews, and other religious minorities, who were often governed under a system of religious autonomy known as the millet system.


https://library.biblicalarchaeology.org/collections/where-did-early-israelites-come/

While the Bible portrays a clear distinction between the Israelites and the Canaanites, modern scholarship suggests that the early Israelites were likely part of the Canaanite population. They may have been rural villagers, displaced peasants, or pastoral groups who gradually coalesced into a distinct group with their own identity and traditions.


And most of that wealth in Israel is imported... setting up and supporting its high tech industry which is now suffering brain drain.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/war-spurs-brain-drain-outflow-of-israeli-high-tech-employees-report-finds/



And pretty much relying on a permanent war economy nowadays
https://www.securityincontext.org/posts/merchants-of-death-israels-permanent-war-economy


But if you want to boil it all down to, Jews are smarter thus they hate them... Maybe learn some history.

Now why Jews (who are not a race) are more intelligent (at least in IQ tests) is because of their religion and traditions. Education!

The Torah strongly promotes education. Jewish tradition places a high value on learning and studying, particularly the Torah itself, and it commands parents to educate their children. This emphasis on education is seen as crucial for both individual development and the continuity of Jewish life and tradition. 

Education, the very thing Trump is dismantling further...

(And why I put at least in IQ tests in parenthesis is because with all that available intelligence Israel has still not found a way to peacefully co-exist with their neighbors)