By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LegitHyperbole said:
Ryuu96 said:

-Snip-

Anything that doesn't cause harm or lead to harm. If the people your defending who have a right to violently protest didn't have a voice or were so afraid of their Governemnt like in China where they actually get "disappeared" as someone said above you wouldn't see any of this for all the wrong reasons. You are for freedom of press but not free speech which is the backbone of freedom of press. And yes, someone can say something out of emotion or from a completely innocent perspective or even a bad joke and still be held to account as people like the KKK, putting neaurodivergent people at severe risk of these laws and you can't do two tier justice so no protections and also the beurocracy would not see a difference either way. And like I said before, our governments change, now those laws could work for you but in 10 years those laws could work very much against you and you could be put in jail for speaking undeniable objective facts that are clear for anyone with eyes to see. 

I know I don't have much in the way to give you in discussion but as I'm neurodivergent I fear getting banned for saying the wrong thing much like I and many will fear getting sent to jail for saying or doing the wrong thing (or acting the "wrong way" which is seen as creepy and can cause offence) should these laws, against all common sense, be put on paper. Also, don't give me the, if you've nothing hateful to say you won't be jailed but when laws become ridiculously wishy washy like the site rules here and on many other sites that are volunteer moderated anything can be taken as hateful or the judge can rule against someone based on their emotion or political stance and get away with it Scott free. 

This is the first brick in our modern western society that if pulled will cause a whole heap of other bricks to come tumbling down on top of us, war or no war and in the cyber age it's probable and logical to think that we may never get these freedoms back as, like you said protests in the past have been violent but violent protests have proved to do absolutely nothing in the age we live in, in fact it they help with control and governmental manipulation as we saw in Hong Kong. 

Tag me when the gun turns around the other way, religious zeolets have gained control of EU countries and have these laws to work with and you, a poor atheist who has posted all your opinions online gets life in jail for not having the right opinions retroactively. 

"Anything that doesn't cause harm or lead to harm" - This rules out a lot of so called "free speech" so I agree with that. For example, if someone is spreading lies, that can lead to harm, like when Musk's Twitter spread lies which led to riots in the UK. Racism can lead to harm, Russian propaganda can lead to harm, etc. So those sorts of "free speech" absolutely should be restricted.

I'm not a big fan of the press lately, a lot of the press in the West seem to believe their job is only to be a megaphone for politicians bullshit, it used to be that the press were there because they had a responsibility to the public, they were there to present the actual facts of the situation and hold politicians to account, not simply allow anyone to spew any bullshit and not correct it.

Someone saying something out of emotion, is entirely context dependent and depends entirely on what they actually say, thus I can't really make a blanket comment. Likewise, neurodivergence is a very, very broad brush, it's very context dependent but generally, folk can't go around being assholes and then saying "Sorry, I'm neurodivergent" as an excuse for being an asshole. In fact, it's probably more insulting to many neurodivergent people when someone uses their neurodivergence as an excuse like that.

I think you're worrying over nothing, I don't know what this "wrong thing" is, I don't know what this jail fear is for "saying or doing the wrong thing" or "acting the wrong way" and I don't even know what these laws are that you're talking about. Your comments are incredibly vague. These apparent wishy washy site rules have resulted in you being moderated twice during your entire time here, Lol.

"Violent protests have proved to do absolutely nothing in the age we live in" - See the Euromaiden.

Religious zeolets have gained control of EU countries and have these laws to work with and you, a poor atheist who has posted all your opinions online gets life in jail for not having the right opinions retroactively. 

Don't worry, we're already fighting back against the religious Zealots that America is exporting to the UK. The same ones trying to attack folk for receiving abortions. I'm not really a major fan of organised religion to begin with, they all have large examples of being used for oppression and control, including Christianity, America currently has a large portion of Christian Fascists and Russia uses Christianity to support their Nazism.

But in many European countries, Atheism or "No-Religion" is quickly becoming the largest share.

It's also funny, because many of America's closest allies are some of the biggest abusers of restricting speech, human rights, etc. Got old bone saw in Saudi Arabia chopping up journalists for being critical. Try criticising Israel as an American politician as well, it's almost career ending to do so, Lol. Especially on the side of Republicans, all because of religious nonsense.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - 21 hours ago

Around the Network



 

 

 

 

 

LegitHyperbole said:

Anything that doesn't cause harm or lead to harm. If the people your defending who have a right to violently protest didn't have a voice or were so afraid of their Governemnt like in China where they actually get "disappeared" as someone said above you wouldn't see any of this for all the wrong reasons. You are for freedom of press but not free speech which is the backbone of freedom of press. And yes, someone can say something out of emotion or from a completely innocent perspective or even a bad joke and still be held to account as people like the KKK, putting neaurodivergent people at severe risk of these laws and you can't do two tier justice so no protections and also the beurocracy would not see a difference either way. And like I said before, our governments change, now those laws could work for you but in 10 years those laws could work very much against you and you could be put in jail for speaking undeniable objective facts that are clear for anyone with eyes to see. 

I know I don't have much in the way to give you in discussion but as I'm neurodivergent I fear getting banned for saying the wrong thing much like I and many will fear getting sent to jail for saying or doing the wrong thing (or acting the "wrong way" which is seen as creepy and can cause offence) should these laws, against all common sense, be put on paper. Also, don't give me the, if you've nothing hateful to say you won't be jailed but when laws become ridiculously wishy washy like the site rules here and on many other sites that are volunteer moderated anything can be taken as hateful or the judge can rule against someone based on their emotion or political stance and get away with it Scott free. 

This is the first brick in our modern western society that if pulled will cause a whole heap of other bricks to come tumbling down on top of us, war or no war and in the cyber age it's probable and logical to think that we may never get these freedoms back as, like you said protests in the past have been violent but violent protests have proved to do absolutely nothing in the age we live in, in fact it they help with control and governmental manipulation as we saw in Hong Kong. 

Tag me when the gun turns around the other way, religious zeolets have gained control of EU countries and have these laws to work with and you, a poor atheist who has posted all your opinions online gets life in jail for not having the right opinions retroactively. 

It really bothers me that you like to push around "neurodivergent" as a safeguard, when some of the people that I know, that are the most vocal about these kinds of things are neurodivergent. 

Having autism doesn't make someone say "Death to Ukrainians" or anything that vile. 

Having autism doesn't make someone put on a swastika. 

Last edited by the-pi-guy - 19 hours ago

America’s Christian Right Is Coming to the U.K. | The New Republic

"The European Union, one of the most hostile and abusive taxing and tariffing authorities in the World, which was formed for the sole purpose of taking advantage of the United States, has just put a nasty 50% Tariff on Whisky," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform Wednesday morning.

"If this Tariff is not removed immediately, the U.S. will shortly place a 200% Tariff on all WINES, CHAMPAGNES, & ALCOHOLIC PRODUCTS COMING OUT OF FRANCE AND OTHER E.U. REPRESENTED COUNTRIES.

"This will be great for the Wine and Champagne businesses in the U.S."

Trump Threatens France With 200% Wine and Champagne Tariffs

"The EU's punitive action completely disregards the national security imperatives of the United States – and indeed international security – and is yet another indicator that the EU's trade and economic policies are out of step with reality," Greer said.

US Trade Rep Greer Says EU Retaliation Ignores US National Security Needs

Lutnick: Think about it. The biggest trading partner in the whole world that is vital to Canada’s existence says, “I’m unhappy,” and they respond negatively, you know why? Because for 20 years, 30 years, they’ve gotten away with it. It’s like Ukraine. They came in. You imagine coming into this country, sitting in the Oval Office, having received $300 billion in aid from U.S. and military and NATO and all the rest, and the first words out of your mouth aren’t thank you. Just say thank you. God knows, just say thank you. When the biggest client, the biggest trading partner, the most important counter-party you have, who really, really matters to you, the first thing you do is showing immeasurable respect. Say, “Thank you. I want to work it out with you. I want you to be happy.”

'Just Say Thank You': Lutnick Says Canada is Acting Like Ukraine in Trump Negotiations



America the moment someone fights back.



Around the Network

"great for the champagne businesses in USA" - does he realize that Champagne can only come from the Champagne? There is no American Champagne...



Trump made the comments during a meeting with Irish premier Micheal Martin as part of his St Patrick’s Day engagements. Asked who his favourite Irish person is, Trump admitted there were “many” before remarking: “I do happen to like your fighter. “He’s got the best tattoos I’ve ever seen. Conor’s great, right. But you have a lot of great Irish fighters actually, great fighters.”

Donald Trump Names ‘Great’ Conor McGregor As His Favourite Irish Person

He said this sitting alongside the Irish Prime Minister, Lmfao. Conor McGregor is hated in a lot of places but I've never seen a single Irish person say they liked him either, despite the fact that he's from Ireland, I've only ever seen Irish people say he's a massive twat. He's also a rapist, woman abuser and massive racist and long speculated that he uses Irish gangs (Kinahan Cartel) to threaten his victims.

The Tate Brothers, Conor McGregor. I'm sensing a pattern with the people Trump likes.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - 19 hours ago

crissindahouse said:

"great for the champagne businesses in USA" - does he realize that Champagne can only come from the Champagne? There is no American Champagne...

Haha.

He does this with everything Tbh.

"DOESN'T MATTER. WE'LL MAKE IT IN AMERICA!" - Literally every single thing in the world.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - 18 hours ago

Elon Musk is about 1 tweet away from another PR trip to Auschwitz.



https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-white-house-asked-us-military-develop-options-panama-canal-offic-rcna195994

Planning on mobilizing the military to Panama.  

So good to have a non accelerationist president.