Your most anticipated upcoming Xbox RPG in 2025? | |||
The Outer Worlds 2 | 2 | 12.50% | |
The Elder Scrolls: Oblivion remaster/remake | 5 | 31.25% | |
Fable | 6 | 37.50% | |
Avowed | 3 | 18.75% | |
Total: | 16 |
Ryuu96 said: He says new entry so I'm 99% sure he doesn't mean "new to Xbox" but I question if a "remake" counts as a new entry, in which case, could it be FF9 Remake? Nate 100% confirmed FF16 and FF7R are coming to Xbox but question is if this is the event they announce them at, if it is then I could see whatever this Japanese title being is from Square Enix and they attach these FF ports to it. |
If FF9R is anything like FF7R, you can consider it a new entry.
BasilZero said:
FF9R would be amazing. There's also the possibility of the remaster/remake of Final Fantasy Tactics that has been rumored for the past two years.
Almost forgot about DQ12. Damn, its been so long since they announced it. Good one. |
FF tactics needs a remake/remaster so bad, idk what they are waiting for lol
ice said: FF tactics needs a remake/remaster so bad, idk what they are waiting for lol |
It was in the Nvidia leak alongside FF9 Remake.
The last time Tactics was remastered was for PSP/iOS/android but that was like 18 years ago so ya lol
Hoping for at least that or FF9 remake to be announced this year hopefully.
Their seems to be a good buy 1 get 2 deal going on...also saw their is a new neptunia game?
Anyway I only got:
- Journey to Kreisia
- Alan wake remastered
- The Messenger
I hope Amazon makes a Lunar xbox physical, it was a day 1 buy for me when they announced it would become available on disc but sadly not looking good. Only switch and PS4 in Europe, looks like Amazon in the US will follow their lead (I hope not but... looks to be the case)
I really don't like the argument of games being too big because just x percent finished them. This may be a good argument for linear games but not for games with open worlds. When I stop to play a game after 50 hours and didn't finish it, it doesn't mean that it was too big for me. It means that I had so much fun just doing other stuff that I didn't want or care to finish it. Decreasing the size of the game could very well make it a worse game for me even if I would finish it then.
crissindahouse said: I really don't like the argument of games being too big because just x percent finished them. This may be a good argument for linear games but not for games with open worlds. When I stop to play a game after 50 hours and didn't finish it, it doesn't mean that it was too big for me. It means that I had so much fun just doing other stuff that I didn't want or care to finish it. Decreasing the size of the game could very well make it a worse game for me even if I would finish it then. |
Same here. Don't take away my big games. If you don't have time to pump in 100+ hours into a game, then don't purchase it. No need to ruin it for the people who do enjoy the bloat and collecting.
...to avoid getting banned for inactivity, I may have to resort to comments that are of a lower overall quality and or beneath my moral standards.
crissindahouse said: I really don't like the argument of games being too big because just x percent finished them. This may be a good argument for linear games but not for games with open worlds. When I stop to play a game after 50 hours and didn't finish it, it doesn't mean that it was too big for me. It means that I had so much fun just doing other stuff that I didn't want or care to finish it. Decreasing the size of the game could very well make it a worse game for me even if I would finish it then. |
I'm with you. Actually I like the fact that I can choose to go back in a game (esp. open world) and still be able to explore "after completing" the main story.
And this for hours... :) And it 100% up to my choice.