give me dat nasa punk

And Mojang? And MLB The Show? And Bungie?

Add to the pile of weak ass arguments, Lol.

1 Year

Played some infection, was fun. Now waiting for the next season ^^'.

Not even 5 years ago the first company ever (Apple) hit the milestone of 1 trillion.

Final Fantasy XVI is at 88 Metacritic right now, currently more accurate than OpenCritic so @ice & @Spade how ya feeling?

I think there's 1-2 point difference in it, I think Starfield will most likely hit high 80s as well but low 90s is possible if it's lucky.

Who will be down $60! 👀

FF 16 reviewed a little lower than i thought (92). Still feel somewhat confident, going into September. Hoping Xbox bias media and overly ambitious goals bring it down to 87 ish. I'm putting Starfield at an 87 overall meta.

Might end up in a tie. And no Angie, you not gettin in this bet, go find another dent to bet with.

@ice game on peeeemp.

88 metacritic, 90 opencritic for FF16 so far. That is the baseline that Starfield needs to top in order to win RPG of the year for 2023. Do you think Bethesda can pull it off? They have managed it on Morrowind (89 meta, RPG of the Year for 2002), Oblivion (94 meta, RPG of the Year and Game of the Year for 2006), Fallout 3 (93 meta, RPG of the Year and Game of the Year for 2008), and Skyrim (96 meta, RPG of the Year and Game of the Year for 2011). However, their most recent singleplayer RPG, Fallout 4, got an 88 meta and only came in 2nd place on both RPG of the Year and Game of the Year behind Witcher 3 back in 2015. Does Bethesda have it in them to reclaim their Best RPG throne this time around?

They really took their time on Starfield compared to Fallout 4, which they rushed out with only 2.5 years of full production (mid 2013-November 2015), so I personally think they can pull off a reclaiming of their Best RPG throne with Starfield unless critic bias against them for being an Xbox studio now is extremely high.