By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Russia and Ukraine flashpoint



Around the Network
crissindahouse said:

This whole discussion is so stupid. If the West would try and REALLY support Ukraine, then Russia would be out of Ukraine in a few months. So Slovakia is kind of correct that the West could eventually backstab Ukraine and Ukraine will be forced to give up territory because it doesn't look as if the West is willing to do more. But Russia itself isn't the problem. They are not undefeatable or anything. They are pretty much the opposite of that. They are really weak as we can see since years. Winning a little territory every week against a country which doesn't get what they need to fight back isn't showing a powerful nation.

So, would there be "peace" if the West would help Ukraine to kick Russia out of Ukraine? Maybe not, maybe there wouldn't be a peace agreement even without any Russian on Ukrainian land but who cares? They wouldn't be in Ukraine anymore, call it peace or war if the outcome is the same...

Russia can say they are at war with the West for the next 100 years if they want to. If no Russian soldier would harm anyone anymore outside Russia it wouldn't be a difference. 

Russia has build so many fortification lines and tons of mines that slow down any advance to a crawl unless you're willing to send thousands of soldiers to their deaths by clearing the minefields with the method of stepping on them. Just look what happened with the 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive and how it stalled due to this.

So no, even with the right weaponry it would take much longer to get the Russians out of Ukraine, especially in the south where they entrenched themselves behind those minefields. In the east it could be achieved more easily due to the constant advance of Russians making minefields useless, so reversing the trend will take time, doubly so as Ukraine is lacking soldiers, and without soldiers even the best weaponry can't do much.



Bofferbrauer2 said:
crissindahouse said:

This whole discussion is so stupid. If the West would try and REALLY support Ukraine, then Russia would be out of Ukraine in a few months. So Slovakia is kind of correct that the West could eventually backstab Ukraine and Ukraine will be forced to give up territory because it doesn't look as if the West is willing to do more. But Russia itself isn't the problem. They are not undefeatable or anything. They are pretty much the opposite of that. They are really weak as we can see since years. Winning a little territory every week against a country which doesn't get what they need to fight back isn't showing a powerful nation.

So, would there be "peace" if the West would help Ukraine to kick Russia out of Ukraine? Maybe not, maybe there wouldn't be a peace agreement even without any Russian on Ukrainian land but who cares? They wouldn't be in Ukraine anymore, call it peace or war if the outcome is the same...

Russia can say they are at war with the West for the next 100 years if they want to. If no Russian soldier would harm anyone anymore outside Russia it wouldn't be a difference. 

Russia has build so many fortification lines and tons of mines that slow down any advance to a crawl unless you're willing to send thousands of soldiers to their deaths by clearing the minefields with the method of stepping on them. Just look what happened with the 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive and how it stalled due to this.

So no, even with the right weaponry it would take much longer to get the Russians out of Ukraine, especially in the south where they entrenched themselves behind those minefields. In the east it could be achieved more easily due to the constant advance of Russians making minefields useless, so reversing the trend will take time, doubly so as Ukraine is lacking soldiers, and without soldiers even the best weaponry can't do much.

Without equipment those soldiers and their trenches won't be worth a pile of crap.  Ukraine will also be making plenty of missiles within 4 or 6 months, and that could change things when every important rear ammo depot and command post no longer exists.   They may settle for peace, but Ukraine still has a chance to do enough damage to get a good deal once that takes place.  



Bofferbrauer2 said:
crissindahouse said:

This whole discussion is so stupid. If the West would try and REALLY support Ukraine, then Russia would be out of Ukraine in a few months. So Slovakia is kind of correct that the West could eventually backstab Ukraine and Ukraine will be forced to give up territory because it doesn't look as if the West is willing to do more. But Russia itself isn't the problem. They are not undefeatable or anything. They are pretty much the opposite of that. They are really weak as we can see since years. Winning a little territory every week against a country which doesn't get what they need to fight back isn't showing a powerful nation.

So, would there be "peace" if the West would help Ukraine to kick Russia out of Ukraine? Maybe not, maybe there wouldn't be a peace agreement even without any Russian on Ukrainian land but who cares? They wouldn't be in Ukraine anymore, call it peace or war if the outcome is the same...

Russia can say they are at war with the West for the next 100 years if they want to. If no Russian soldier would harm anyone anymore outside Russia it wouldn't be a difference. 

Russia has build so many fortification lines and tons of mines that slow down any advance to a crawl unless you're willing to send thousands of soldiers to their deaths by clearing the minefields with the method of stepping on them. Just look what happened with the 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive and how it stalled due to this.

So no, even with the right weaponry it would take much longer to get the Russians out of Ukraine, especially in the south where they entrenched themselves behind those minefields. In the east it could be achieved more easily due to the constant advance of Russians making minefields useless, so reversing the trend will take time, doubly so as Ukraine is lacking soldiers, and without soldiers even the best weaponry can't do much.

I think my definition of "real support" will be different to what you think. If that "real support" would happen, Russians would be very happy to go back to where they come from. I don't just talk about giving Ukraine some more tanks and artillery. Even Russia's propaganda machine wouldn't be able to let it look like Russia is dominating anymore. 





Around the Network

More than 100 wounded DPRK soldiers were taken to a Russian hospital. HIMARS cluster munitions hit North Korean special forces. It is known about 50 dead


https://ua-stena.info/en/more-than-100-wounded-dprk-soldiers-were-taken-to-a-russian-hospital/#google_vignette

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Multiple videos on this link. It appears that Ukraine has caused many casualties.



Satellite Images Show Scale of Russian Losses As 'Outdated' Vehicles Used



You Kick Out Russians, We Lift Sanctions, EU Hints to Syrian Authorities
The EU has sent a top diplomat to initiate contacts with the rebel groups that had ousted the Assad regime from Syria and to raise the issue of Russia’s continued military presence in the country.

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/44050



NATO to coordinate Western aid to Ukraine instead of US – Reuters
Unnamed diplomats told the agency that the new mission may have a limited effect since Washington could still reduce its support for Kyiv

https://news.liga.net/en/all/news/nato-to-coordinate-western-aid-to-ukraine-instead-of-us-reuters

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This seems like a good idea, knowing where Trump's loyalties lie



This is one of the few times that I get pissed off.  I'm gonna relax after this but i don't like it.  They get signed up after a promise of a large amount of $$$$ (if they survive).  Unfortunately, the oldest trick in the book is to send the units that you don't care about into heavy combat.  I think that King David in the old testament sent a soldier into battle and gamed the system so that he would have a very poor chance of coming out ok, and then proceeded to be the white night to some slutty woman now that her husband died (bethsheba perhaps).   

A benefit of this war is that Putin uses it to get rid of people that are not desirable for a strong state:  convicts, minorities, etc.