zero129 said:
You have the best selective posts i've ever seen, or you just always see what you want to see. Care to explain where i said everyone who emulates buys their games?. In fact did you miss this from me " I am also sure that many people do just use them for "Free games", but the is also many people who just use them to reply old games they already own in better quality", i mean it was only like 3 posts above yours so dont know how you missed it. But saying that im not surprised. And no one is pretending anything. If Nintendo had made a Switch Pro instead of the Oled you would be lucky if it even matches the Steamdecks specs. And we are never going to get another Sony handheld so the steamdeck is the next best thing as its the only handheld (Along with other Handheld PC's) that can play Sony games in a handheld form. |
We are talking about emulating Switch, so stop the non-sequitur of very old SW not available to buy anymore or on current HW.
Will you say that the majority of the people emulating Switch on their PC have the game purchased and just decided to skip the advantages of mobility to play it again in a better version (reminding Nintendo fans usually claim graphic is very low on their priority list) of that game? Be sincere.
Yes sure... the display of the steamdeck isn`t even much better than the regular Switch from what was posted here. Plus you would be losing some of the efficiency of the closed platform plus it being a emulation that also takes more of the resources.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."








