By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - What if the next Nintendo console is not the "Switch 2"?

mjk45 said:
victor83fernandes said:

You can actually praise something and still admit its flaws, that's called unbiased opinions.

Just like I can praise ps5 for all the great improvements, and still find countless issues and flaws with it.

No device or game is perfect. Only fanboys will say something is perfect.

Nintendo switch has great amazing games, some of my all time favourites in there from any system, but it could have been a much better console for me if it was more powerful with the pro controller bundled.

Just like I give a lot of praise for Xbox series X, I think its the best console ever made, but it has many issues, lack of single player exclusives, UI too confusing and bloated, rechargeable battery should come bundled, and many more things.

I, unlike most of you here, am objective and unbiased.

The post had nothing to do with unbiased opinions, Kakadu18 was pointing out your contradictory statements that are the very antithesis of the ones you made in this thread .

What are you on about, what contradictory statement? Can you even read in English? There is no contradiction there whatsoever. Mario Odyssey is an exclusive that you cant buy on any other system, and its a fantastic game despite its poor graphics. But I'd never buy a game on switch that would be available on PC or the new consoles because I don't need portability. I really do not understand how you two made the confusion when I explained very clearly in the comments.



Around the Network
victor83fernandes said:
mjk45 said:

The post had nothing to do with unbiased opinions, Kakadu18 was pointing out your contradictory statements that are the very antithesis of the ones you made in this thread .

What are you on about, what contradictory statement? Can you even read in English? There is no contradiction there whatsoever. Mario Odyssey is an exclusive that you cant buy on any other system, and its a fantastic game despite its poor graphics. But I'd never buy a game on switch that would be available on PC or the new consoles because I don't need portability. I really do not understand how you two made the confusion when I explained very clearly in the comments.

Stop with the can you even read english statement I've noticed you use it a lot it doesn't hurt to be civil, the contradictory statement is this

"Games on Nintendo are not worth full price, because they cant compare graphically and performance wise to the competition, I didnt want a portable, I dont have time to play portable, I only play when I get home, so the switch is severely underpowered compared to my ps5 and even my xbox one X, why would I pay 70 euros for a game on switch in 1080p or less, that is available for 40 euros on the other consoles in 4k?

Compare that to this

I have both the ps5, PC and switch, I'd take the switch over the ps5 any day, first of all because I have all games for free, then because graphics aren't everything

Last edited by mjk45 - on 24 August 2021

Research shows Video games  help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot

Wman1996 said:
curl-6 said:

Yeah there is simply no good reason for Nintendo to go back to a dedicated home console now, the hybrid concept is just so much more successful and doesn't divide their limited development resources.

I could them MAYBE make a reverse Lite/Vita Home type deal, but not an independent home console, there is simply no point.

Exactly. A Switch or Switch 2 with a home console only version (like PlayStation TV) would be a very welcome option for people who want a cheaper product than the standard hybrid and don't give a crap about portable play. Or maybe they have enough money and want a second Switch in their house that's tv only. 

I do think Nintendo will release a Switch TV at some point. 2022 might be a good time, or 2023 depending on how long we have to wait until the Switch 2 comes out. 

Yeah a $199 Switch TV would be a smart play in my opinion; bring in those who don't care about portable play but would still pay an entry level price for Switch's exclusives.



CaptainExplosion said:
curl-6 said:

Yeah a $199 Switch TV would be a smart play in my opinion; bring in those who don't care about portable play but would still pay an entry level price for Switch's exclusives.

Yes, but what about those who want that but also want to trade Pokemon and aren't able to or planning on getting Switch Lite or regular Switch?

What about them? Honestly I don't even know how trading Pokémon works on Switch but if it requires a local connection then either their friends can bring over their Switch or they can just buy a Lite/hybrid/OLED instead. Not a big deal.