By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Official Protest Thread

sundin13 said:
S.Peelman said:

This is why getting history in school, is of utmost importance. Those idots don’t exactly help up the American people’s overal intelligence score.

Precisely. We have schooling so we don't need to have statues of horrible people in our public squares.

That was what you were saying, right?

Sad part about history books I used in past at school had one small paragraph about Vikings discovering America first then dedicate 2-4 pages on Columbus.  We then give him his own holiday and try to still state he was first European to find Americas.  Can't even teach history right in schools.



Around the Network
SvennoJ said:
pikashoe said:

I agree that change needs to happen, but is this the way to do it at this particular moment in time. If this pandemic wasn't going on I'd be supportive of these protests. I'm just afraid of the potentially massive cost of life that will come from this. We know if a big spike does arise that dumb racists will just use it as a way to justify there racism. Which could end up making racial tensions even worse.

Maybe you're right and these protests will make things better, but there's also a chance that they wont and things could get even worse.

Logic is not humanities strong point.

Last year 235 black people were killed by the police in the USA.
21,878 black people were killed by covid19 up to may 26, about 21.7% of the total deaths at that point.
Last week had 5306 reported deaths in the USA, thus about 1150 black people lose there lives, every week while this keeps going.
(Black people have a higher death rate, however in absolute numbers, still more white people die of covid19)

The USA has already lost its decline and is hovering around break even week over week.

So yes, logic says, these protests will end up killing far more people than the police managed in many years.

However you can't protest a virus nor hold a virus responsible. Racism kills in far more ways than police brutality and its about time some real changes happen. Tanking the economy is a way to force reform and people have died for less worthy causes. It sucks though that its mostly the 60+ that will take the hit of these protests. (80% of deaths are people over 60) Old people are racists anyway....

Ageism is no more acceptable than racism.  Let's not make those kinds of broad accusations against any group.



JWeinCom said:
SvennoJ said:

Logic is not humanities strong point.

Last year 235 black people were killed by the police in the USA.
21,878 black people were killed by covid19 up to may 26, about 21.7% of the total deaths at that point.
Last week had 5306 reported deaths in the USA, thus about 1150 black people lose there lives, every week while this keeps going.
(Black people have a higher death rate, however in absolute numbers, still more white people die of covid19)

The USA has already lost its decline and is hovering around break even week over week.

So yes, logic says, these protests will end up killing far more people than the police managed in many years.

However you can't protest a virus nor hold a virus responsible. Racism kills in far more ways than police brutality and its about time some real changes happen. Tanking the economy is a way to force reform and people have died for less worthy causes. It sucks though that its mostly the 60+ that will take the hit of these protests. (80% of deaths are people over 60) Old people are racists anyway....

Ageism is no more acceptable than racism.  Let's not make those kinds of broad accusations against any group.

I don't know the proper emoji to use for sarcasm, hence the .... I thought it was clear by the 'it sucks' on the previous line. If I really thought old people are all racists it would be great to keep protesting and kill more old people in the process ;)

Yet true ageism is also at play in this pandemic. The age group mostly responsible for spreading it gets the mildest symptoms and just wants to go back to normal life asap.



SvennoJ said:
JWeinCom said:

Ageism is no more acceptable than racism.  Let's not make those kinds of broad accusations against any group.

I don't know the proper emoji to use for sarcasm, hence the .... I thought it was clear by the 'it sucks' on the previous line. If I really thought old people are all racists it would be great to keep protesting and kill more old people in the process ;)

Yet true ageism is also at play in this pandemic. The age group mostly responsible for spreading it gets the mildest symptoms and just wants to go back to normal life asap.

Sarcasm doesn't always work well on the internet.  If I misunderstood you, my bad.



John2290 said:
Pemalite said:

Not defending ANTIFA, as I believe their stance on meeting violence with violence to be something I am strictly against.

But they also wouldn't exist if Facism didn't exist.

They exist as an extremist to oppose other extremists.

It's all well and good to constantly lay the blame at ANTIFA... But the issue is an entirely political and systemic one in the USA that allows such extremism to breed to such extents to start with on both sides of the political divide.


You fail to understand Antifa's purpose  they use "antifa" as a recruiting tool but they are in reality communists, like left of Stalin types, and some are anarchists. It's really just the fools at the lowest level who think they are fighting fascists but hey, 99.9% of people aren't facists in the western world. 

ANTIFA is a "collection of groups and individuals" out to achieve the same goal, not a singular cohesive entity with any kind of structure, so they don't really have a recruitment system into a "group" or any kind of control. - Anyone can thus technically join and use the name "ANTIFA" any way they want, good or bad.

Generally they are united by a single goal, to remove fascist extremism like white supremacy and Nazism... And are against the government, authoritarian regimes, capitalism and so forth.
And you are right there are people with different views in ANTIFA, there are even some right-wing individuals as they get their rocks off from the general excitement of protesting and rallying against government in general.

There is some socializing and networking that goes on in order to disseminate information though, but for the most part it's all pretty non-cohesive, it's surprising that they are as effective as they are to be honest.

Again, not defending their use of violence to meet violence... But ANTIFA in general wouldn't exist if fascism didn't exist, it's literally why ANTIFA came to be.

Immersiveunreality said:

Indeed the badly behaving amongst them will always exist and if they do not fight this they will find another ghost to act out their hatefullness.

Not saying they all fight ghosts but would it matter?

The law needs to crack down on them... And the law needs to crack down on their opponents.
Left-wing media only seems to focus on right-wing extremists like Neo-Nazi's and white supremacists which I find frustrating and disingenuous..
And right-wing media only focuses and moans about ANTIFA, which is also disingenuous.

It's frustrating how both sides of the media (And the people who sit on those sides of the political ideology fence) are moaning about the same bullshit, but with a different flag. - They are honestly as bad as each other.

Right wing or left wing extremism is still extremism, both sides need to be managed effectively as it undermines societal cohesiveness, the law needs to recognize this and effectively step in, not step away due to "freedom of speech" or "freedom of protesting". - Extremism shouldn't be a freedom, there is never an excuse for violence.

But you are right, these are individuals, regardless if you are a White Supremacist or part of ANTIFA, they are full of hate, ridicule and intolerance... And the further left or right you go on the political spectrum, the more the left and right are the same... Aka. The Political Horseshoe theory.





www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

Around the Network
JWeinCom said:
SvennoJ said:

I don't know the proper emoji to use for sarcasm, hence the .... I thought it was clear by the 'it sucks' on the previous line. If I really thought old people are all racists it would be great to keep protesting and kill more old people in the process ;)

Yet true ageism is also at play in this pandemic. The age group mostly responsible for spreading it gets the mildest symptoms and just wants to go back to normal life asap.

Sarcasm doesn't always work well on the internet.  If I misunderstood you, my bad.

No worries. It's all crap right now. Black lives matter and my eyes were opened as well when I read that you are 20x more likely to get shot by the police in Toronto when black. And that's over a year ago already, I didn't even notice it back then :/ My bad.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/10/toronto-black-residents-more-likely-shot-dead-ontario-human-rights-commission-report

However now people are having a rally in the town next to us, yet my wife's life matters as well and she is at severe risk to covid19. It was small (hundreds not thousands) and I see lots of face masks in the footage. But local reported cases still keep going up.

Perhaps do something original, like think up new names for Dundas st and plaster them all over the street signs. Plenty to choose from
https://www.cbc.ca/news2/interactives/black-history-month/
Viola Desmond street, sounds good to me.



Some preliminary results of the protests:

https://youtu.be/WguclzZMRGg



sundin13 said:
S.Peelman said:

This is why getting history in school, is of utmost importance. Those idots don’t exactly help up the American people’s overal intelligence score.

Precisely. We have schooling so we don't need to have statues of horrible people in our public squares.

That was what you were saying, right?

No what I’m saying is that Christopher Columbus stumbling across a continent he wasn’t even looking for wasn’t the cause of people’s misfortune today. Did you get any history in school?



Ka-pi96 said:
sundin13 said:

Precisely. We have schooling so we don't need to have statues of horrible people in our public squares.

That was what you were saying, right?

Horrible people? Who cares if they're horrible or not?

We shouldn't have statues in public squares full stop.

Wasting taxpayer money on ugly chunks of rock is one of the most idiotic things that you can possibly do. Especially when you consider just how many 1st world countries are running at a deficit. Yet they'll still idiotically throw money down the toilet?

These statues (among other pieces of art, of course) can become tourist magnets, paying for themselves over time through the tourists they attract. One alone doesn't achieve much, but the more there are, the better they are at attracting tourists. Investing into culture ain't throwing money out of the window, it's a kind of investment. It's also supposed to bring some beautification, attracting people to live there, helping the local governments in earning taxes.

Just looking at the cost and thinking it doesn't have any effect is just too narrow-minded and leaves out almost literally half the picture.



JWeinCom said:

"Thanks for the links. These numbers confirm my initial quote of 49% reported by FBI for 2015, since it is 53% of murders committed by African Americans if you exclude the unknowns, the overall picture does not change. The sample is big enough anyway."

So... the number you posted 49%.  Is actually not reported anywhere by the FBI... but if we ignore a huge chunk of the data it would be 53%... So the number you reported, which was not 53%, is actually right..? 

If you ignore the "unknown" category, you're limiting it to black and white which ignores huge categories of people.  Mixed race, hispanics who are non-black and not white etc. And you can't just ignore a third of the data set. A sample doesn't simply have to be large, it has to be representative, and if you just throw out 1/3 of the data, it might not be. You'd have to know a lot more about why the unknown category is unknown before you can alter the data like that. And of course, we're still nowhere near the 6:1 ratio of crime that you're claiming.  

Honestly, where did the 49% figure come from?

"You are right for the homicide chart, it is victims instead of murders! It still helps us to find out who kills who. If half the murders are committed by African Americans and they are also the most victims by far, then it seems they kill each other a lot. Pretty ironic for the BLM movement... : /"

You still don't seem to know what this chart actually shows.  It doesn't show how often the races are victims of homicide, it shows the prevalence of homicide as a cause of death in that race vs other potential causes of death, specifically among a narrow age range.  That's a completely different statistic.

In the graph you posted the bar for black people is 4x that for white people.  In actuality, they are victims about 1.2 times as often. I'd hardly say they're the most victims "by far".  You could have actually looked up the actual data really easily.

"Oh what a discovery, it's google and wikipedia yes, time optimization you know? I don't wanna waste ages to reach the same statistics. I never did a deep research/analysis on the matter, nor did I claim to. I suggested a possible explanation, and since I am not American I'm looking for other opinions in order to better understand what's going on and shape mine. That's why my first line on the thread was "any comments on this chart?"

Asking for comments does not mean you are actually looking into the issue.  It depends on how open you actually are to changing your position. I'm not saying that's what's going on here, but posting something inflammatory and saying "Golly gee, what do you guys think about this" is a pretty common form of trolling.

It took me literally less than a minute to google "FBI murder statistics".  I'm not expecting a thesis here, but why use decade old data from an unreliable source when recent data from official sources is readily available? The amount of effort you put into gathering the information makes me question how much you care about coming to a reasonable conclusion.

And yes I had an impression of how black crime rates are higher, judging from trending music videos and the rappers that ended up in jail...

Seriously? Music videos and rappers are evidence? Should I assume Christians have a higher rate of pedophilia because of all the Catholic priests that are pedophiles? If this is how you're making judgments, your epistemology is fundamentally flawed.

And if crime figures that relate police and black people do not relate to the conversation by you, then what does? If you have something that relates more then share it.

So... you don't have an explanation then of why the number of murders is relevant to the subject of police brutality? I honestly don't see why the murder rate would justify that.  I didn't make a claim, so I have nothing to bring up. You're the one who brought it up dude, it's your job to connect the dots.

Of course there are many factors that relate to the numbers we have, which you already mentioned and I agree, but the overall picture is too obvious to be altered by those. When a 13% of the population does 50% of the murders and has an equal prison population with the 72%, it is clear that in US there is a big issue with crime from African Americans and police is obviously handling it very very badly.

Yeah, there's a problem with crime and African Americans, either with enforcement or actually committing crimes... And this justifies the rate of cop killings you posted because..?

"You're wrong on pretty much every count." and you are always right O.K.

Doesn't change the fact that what you said was demonstrably wrong.  If I said something wrong, then feel free to point it out so I can adjust my position accordingly.

I never said that music videos/rappers in jail are evidence, just a rough idea when compared to white rappers, open music videos with millions of views and fans is very different from evil pedophile Priests that do crime in utter secrecy while playing the divine, if they were publicly admitting it and still had millions of supporters then by all means, your impression would be reasonable

if you wanna blame me for posting 49% instead of 53% - in favοr of black people anyway - then blame me, I don't really note sources just numbers, as this is a casual gaming forum and not a formal university meeting, sorry I forgot that you always look to prove me wrong no matter what, I'll make sure to note all the sources next time

a randomly chosen sample of 10,000 is considered more than enough in statistics to represent the population of a million, used in election polls, dna sampling and soooo much more, the unknowns will closely follow the rest of the data anyway, if you think 10000/15000 is not enough to draw a general representation of US murders, then I would suggest reading a statistics book (how sampling relates to the margin of error and levels of confidence) or stop reading numerical data all together since it should all be meaningless under your views

of course murders unresolved are not exactly 'random' but still, unless you accuse FBI of deliberately turning blind when it comes to white murderers and declaring them as unresolved, and blaming black people with every chance, then the unknowns play a relatively small role, 6x as many murders is too huge to be balanced by that - even if the white murders are super genius and hide their guilt, it is unrealistic to expect it to be 6x as much to balance things out...

have in mind that we are not talking about 20% or 50% more murders, but a whooping 600%, sure the factors you mentioned play a role but there is no way they would make a difference as huge to make this a close call... even in the most conspiracy against blacks scenario

and for Christ's sake, I never said the cop killings are justified... I had not even fully drawn my conclusions, I was waiting for more responses to shape them up, I'll write a separate post with my opinion and the data that led me towards it :P



don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^