Forums - Gaming Discussion - screw remasters/remakes but if you going to throw away your money spend it on Saints row 3

It's nice, but it's also exclusive to a client I've no intention of installing and running on my rig. Not going to wait a yr to pay for it either. I much prefer the way other pubs/devs did their remasters, when it was simply given as a free update for owning the original game (like the Bioshock series/Skyrim/Mafia etc).



                                       

Around the Network

$40?! Nah... maybe when it's $10.



4 ≈ One

Why the hate for remasters, we got this and we Will get xenoblade soon. Remasters are great.



 

If they do this sort of thing for Saints Row IV too, I'll be so happy, I'm actually VERY surprised with how much nicer it looks, lol



ClassicGamingWizzz said:
Why the hate for remasters, we got this and we Will get xenoblade soon. Remasters are great.

because it isnt new content, for the time they spend on this they could have made a whole city for saints row 5 or release it a year earlier



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network
kirby007 said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
Why the hate for remasters, we got this and we Will get xenoblade soon. Remasters are great.

because it isnt new content, for the time they spend on this they could have made a whole city for saints row 5 or release it a year earlier

Dude, it was done by a diferent studio like most remasters



 

ClassicGamingWizzz said:
kirby007 said:

because it isnt new content, for the time they spend on this they could have made a whole city for saints row 5 or release it a year earlier

Dude, it was done by a diferent studio like most remasters

does that remove the fact they still could have made a city for a NEW GAME? no



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Don't like open world much so won't buy it =p



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

kirby007 said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:

Dude, it was done by a diferent studio like most remasters

does that remove the fact they still could have made a city for a NEW GAME? no

A new game with new voice actors, new soundtrack and licensing, assets, story, engine, etc. Sure.

Hey, why renovate your house? The time it takes to fix up that bathroom, you could have a whole new house.



mZuzek loves AA batteries

kirby007 said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:

Dude, it was done by a diferent studio like most remasters

does that remove the fact they still could have made a city for a NEW GAME? no

Actually yes. Remasters work is quite different than making a full game or even a portion of a game.

It is like when people complain of day one patches or dlcs, they are developed by different type of professionals. Game development timeline make a lot of jobs having a different work load along time.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994