The last 2 teams to beat the #1 rated Offense and Defense in the playoffs before the Titans. 1988 49ers and 2004 Patriots who both won the Superbowl. Had that Titans team started Tannehill week one. They are likely a 11-12 win team.
Who do you believe will have a stronger defense in 2020? | |||
Patriots | 2 | 66.67% | |
Steelers | 1 | 33.33% | |
Total: | 3 |
The last 2 teams to beat the #1 rated Offense and Defense in the playoffs before the Titans. 1988 49ers and 2004 Patriots who both won the Superbowl. Had that Titans team started Tannehill week one. They are likely a 11-12 win team.
KLAMarine said: Stunner. Ravens forgot to remember the Titans. |
After tonight, they'll remember forever.
Current Thread
Is Hardware Getting TOO Powerful?
Older Threads:
PlayStation/Xbox/Switch: 2022 Edition
PlayStation/Xbox/Switch Hardware Battle: 2021 Edition!
PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2019 vs. 2020
PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2018 vs. 2019
PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2017 vs. 2018
PlayStation 4: 2015 vs. 2016 vs. 2017
This is gonna be stuck in my head when I go to sleep tonight.
Current Thread
Is Hardware Getting TOO Powerful?
Older Threads:
PlayStation/Xbox/Switch: 2022 Edition
PlayStation/Xbox/Switch Hardware Battle: 2021 Edition!
PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2019 vs. 2020
PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2018 vs. 2019
PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2017 vs. 2018
PlayStation 4: 2015 vs. 2016 vs. 2017
RolStoppable said:
When the game is already in the fourth quarter, you have to calculate with most likely only three remaining possessions anyway. You need time to get into the endzone thrice while the opponent takes time off the clock. It gets down to the wire in any case. The maths is also simple: If you do it like I suggested, it's virtually guaranteed that the team will have an opportunity to tie the game with the third TD, because PATs have a success rate of ~98%. That helps to keep hope alive which is a crucial factor when attempting a comeback from a huge deficit. When you do it like the Ravens, you put more pressure on the team because it's required to get 8 points twice and the success rate for 2PCs sits at ~45%. Of course it works out well if you converted the initial 2PC, because then you only need 7+7 to tie the game. But this is a gamble because of the low success rate of 2PCs. By the way, what would you do when you are 15 points down? Attempt the 2PC on the first TD or the second one? I'd hope you say the second TD because if the 2PC fails on the first TD, you are staring at a two score game. |
2 score game is a different ball game, assuming you only have time for two possessions. If you fail the two point conversion, you're screwed regardless. You still need to score again.
But that aspect is why it's so crucial to go for two the first time in a three score game. If a team goes for two on the first try and misses, they can still tie the game with two more TDs. It's unlikely, but the opportunity is there. You can miss the first two point conversion and still tie the game with three scores. However, if you wait until the final TD and miss, then you need another score, and you will have needed four scores to tie the game.
Both outcomes produce the same reward from the initial two point conversion if it succeeds, so there's no reason to prefer one there. However, if the initial two point conversion fails, it's much better to have it fail at the beginning rather than the end, because you now have additional opportunities to get those points that you wouldn't have if you wait until the end and bet it all on a single two point conversion. You can think of it like a probability equation. The odds of tying the game if you go for it on the first touchdown are your chances of getting a successful two point conversion plus the odds of you getting two 2 point conversions if the first one fails. Assuming your 45% statistic is right, your odds of tying the game (assuming you can score those three TDs necessary) is .45+(.45*.45), or roughly 65%. Compare that with your odds of tying the game assuming three TDs scored with only one two point conversion, which is just the odds of converting a single two point try, i.e. 45%.
I suppose you can make an argument for hope as an important aspect, but that's a kind of percentage point drop off that seems worth the risk in hope to me.
Titans (0-1, 19 years), Chiefs(1-1, 50 years), or Texans(0-0, never) guaranteed to make the Super Bowl is not what I expected.
Last edited by Farsala - on 12 January 2020Earl Thomas is a clown. Shit talks the Patriots for not tackling Derrick Henry, gets stiff armed into oblivion while his team gives up nearly 200 yards of rushing, and then goes on Twitter and retweets his own highlights after being eliminated from the playoffs. Just wow.
MTZehvor said: Earl Thomas is a clown. Shit talks the Patriots for not tackling Derrick Henry, gets stiff armed into oblivion while his team gives up nearly 200 yards of rushing, and then goes on Twitter and retweets his own highlights after being eliminated from the playoffs. Just wow. |
He will always be a GOAT for flipping off Pete Carroll in Arlington after breaking his arm against Dallas. Or maybe the game was in Seattle, I forget.
Did terrible with my picks yesterday looks like I will do terrible today also. At least the Mavs came back against the 76ers yesterday and the Lakers dominated without LBJ and AD playing yesterday. Looks like we will have a Houston bowl in the AFC title game that should at least be somewhat interesting.
Somehow, this 3 score lead still doesn't seem like much against Kansas City. It's really just the time it takes for Tyreek Hill or Sammy Watkins to run 3 go routes, and there's still a crap load of time left.