AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Yeah but, Resident Evil 4. And the Capcom 5 was defined in large part by being exclusive, meaning to sell Gamecube hardware, and the game set being 5. I don't really think just needing to make new IP means any of those things inherently. It doesn't even need to be 5 games necessarily, like you said, just a couple or so new IPs would be great. Could have just asked why not make unique new IP in that case. I get what you're going for though and I'd love to see that happen. |
I think a "Capcom 5" like project should be done again, just so Capcom has a chance to get it right this time. Game development has come a long way since the GameCube days, and so has Nintendo and Capcom. They don't have to be Switch exclusives, but a collective of 5 or so games all with low-medium budgets and unique, somewhat niche concepts could work wonders for them, especially given their lack of lower-budget games over the past few years.
