The mother owns the body in question, not the fetus. Thus the mother should have the first and last say of what occurs in her body... Otherwise we are giving the rights of the host body to another human being.
If the fetus can survive via it's own power, then let it, but it shouldn't be allowed to at the expense of another person.
As for the Universal Basic Income... Why isn't that a thing in the USA? It works in most other developed nations with great success?
And the expense of the babys life? it isnt important?. Why should the mother have more rights then the child?.
Because the mother is a conscious being while the fetus is not.
Old people who suffer from dementia get their rights removed because they are no longer in a position where they can make reasonable decisions for themselves. In such cases, it's usually a family member of theirs that gets to make the important decisions and sign documents in their name.
Does this mean that humanity discriminates people based on their lack of consciousness? Perhaps, but it's for the best that decisions are made by people who grasp the concepts of cause and effect, and who are aware of the consequences that any decision may entail.