By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - 45-Year Old Dumbass Threatens 11-Year Old Kid Over Fortnite -_-

pokoko said: 

And my "lol" was mocking your ridiculous statement that an 11 year old should not be held responsible for slurs or insults--which it now seems you stand behind.  What's your problem, then?

If you still believe that an 11 year old is not responsible for insults or slurs then we have nothing to talk about.  If you're saying that you didn't mean that, then you're admitting that what you said was wrong.  Nothing else to say, really.  

 

But see, you know what's funny about that? I already explained all of this, including my viewpoint. My first clarification was the only one that was needed. But you kept going and tried to go back all the way to my original responses to pin me down. You wouldn't admit that you took me out of context, or misinterpreted (I don't know which it is now because at first I thought you accidentally did it but your replies made it seem more purposeful). Hell ... you wouldn't even admit what the definition of fallacious is! It took you this long because you didn't want to end it and say "Yeah I perceived your point wrong".

Of course I could have, and should have stopped earlier. That's a fault I have. But I think it's just hilarious that your reflection from all this is how simple it all is. Sure dude, so why did you make it convoluted? 

Good day, and I hope our future arguments go smoother. 



Around the Network

hence why voice chat is muted or off unless in party with friends i know.

plus the man-boy should be banned from any and all electronic forms of entertainment that is a video game as they do not posses the maturity or intelligence to handle themselves. plus its fortnite, ffs.



 

AngryLittleAlchemist said:
pokoko said: 

And my "lol" was mocking your ridiculous statement that an 11 year old should not be held responsible for slurs or insults--which it now seems you stand behind.  What's your problem, then?

If you still believe that an 11 year old is not responsible for insults or slurs then we have nothing to talk about.  If you're saying that you didn't mean that, then you're admitting that what you said was wrong.  Nothing else to say, really.  

 

But see, you know what's funny about that? I already explained all of this, including my viewpoint. My first clarification was the only one that was needed. But you kept going and tried to go back all the way to my original responses to pin me down. You wouldn't admit that you took me out of context, or misinterpreted (I don't know which it is now because at first I thought you accidentally did it but your replies made it seem more purposeful). Hell ... you wouldn't even admit what the definition of fallacious is! It took you this long because you didn't want to end it and say "Yeah I perceived your point wrong".

Of course I could have, and should have stopped earlier. That's a fault I have. But I think it's just hilarious that your reflection from all this is how simple it all is. Sure dude, so why did you make it convoluted? 

Good day, and I hope our future arguments go smoother. 

I don't know what to tell you.  This is what you said:

"Cuss words? Slurs? Was he trolling? So what? That's just standard 11 year old online behavior. It's normal and instead of criticizing him for the possibility of that happening all accountability should be put on the party that is mature."

Read over that a few times.  I didn't misinterpret, you phrased badly.  That's not my fault.  I responded to the literal interpretation of your statement.  I said that each party is responsible for their own actions and that the actions of the worse offense do not negate the actions of the lesser.  You think that's fallacious?  Alright.  I don't think there is anything else to say.