Since you and I are the only ones discussing this part of the topic, do you think it can be done? I have my reservations that this licensee or any other will successfully do it. It would be nice for them to succeed though. It still leaves it up in the air that even if one licensee is successful, if the next one will be. Epic has already stated they will not create a usable UE3 for the Wii, so each licensee would have to figure it out for themselves.

Do you think the Wii can take over as lead platform on many multiplatform games with the hurdles of UE3 on Wii and the fact that the engine is so popular to use? I mean for christ sakes even Square is using it. I just can't see the Wii taking lead platform over many multiplats unless UE3 is made available by Epic as a usable option for the Wii at the time of licensing. 

Further, the two systems use different architectures. You can't compare them directly number for number because it isn't the same kind of technology. Look up the system requirements for PC/Mac games to see what I am talking about. There is a noticeable difference because the tech doesn't function identically.

Ridiculously biased pics? I made a conscious effort to get pics with lots of detail and a good view of the characters from both games, from the same website, AND in the native resolution. You're just crying cause you made up some total bullshit and got busted for it.

Well if the developer figures it out, they could just make a deal with Epic to license the Wii version to other developers.

It's still up in the air how it will work, so for now, I'm just waiting.

 Would you like to give a couple of links???, the E3 reports of that year pointed the opposite (Capcom made a promess about given more textures in exchange of the lack of quality of the texts in the PS2 version)... (I´m looking for them, but so far I have only found spanish comments about that)

I can't really link. Just get both versions if you don't have them yet (or the Wii version in lieu of the GC version), and run around looking at same items with any zoom scope. Some items have a lower polygon count, but the texture resolution is the same. I practically made my eyes blurry to confirm it.

And the screen resolution should be obvious, since the GC version was the one without widescreen support, and the PS2 and Wii versions do.

If the GC version could even handle a higher resolution, then why was it leterboxed, instead of at least full screen. The thing is that the PS2 lacked texture resolution, but that wasn't needed for the frame buffer, which is 50% larger than the GC's frame buffer. 

The pics are biased now, are they? What, do they call you names?

Is it just me or have we had these threads before, and i think we had the same posters in those that we have in this thread. I'm pretty sure Fazz said that the wii might be possible to have games better looking then some of the PS3/360 games.

Let's face it. God himself couldn't settle this. Okay, maybe an omnipotent being could, but not without usurping our free will.

EDIT: I mean a supreme being could appear, tell us exactly how the systems compare, and some would still disagree.