lol thats why i win all my bets ;) i also get many of predictions right. especially with  you, every time you questioned me, saying my predictions are ridiculous  you come out wrong, like  november, feb, and march.

Well, of course you win all of your bets, you made a claim that the PS4 would outsell the Switch by 80k+ but then you refused to bet on it.

Your bias played a trick on you. You saw a bunch of predictions that had Switch ahead by more than one million units, got upset by that and subsequently started to believe that it's a widespread opinion that Switch will destroy the PS4 in 2018. Remember, the whole "fall of a cliff" meme also came to be because you overreacted.

Here are the ResetEra predictions:

The ResetEra consensus is that Switch wins by a good 600k units in 2018 or sells about 12% more. The consensus was not that Switch will destroy the PS4, because the margin of victory is too small to draw such a conclusion.

Generalisations are bad. They remove accountability while at the same time they commonly misrepresent a situation; at times it's deliberate, but it's also possible to happen without any ill-intentions. Throwing out an accusation is very easy by means of a generalisation. It's bad enough when it's done within the confines of the VGC community, but using another website's community as a scapegoat to claim heavy Nintendo bias is much worse. As it turns out, not even that is true, so your claims and subsequent defense of them have been especially bad.

1. Mario released in Oct, obviously its affects crossed over into Nov but the point stands.

2. Last Nov the biggest new release was Skyrim, a year old port of a 6 year old remaster.

3. What if Nov has a huge title this year like Pokemon?

4. What if they have actual black friday deals this year? Last year had no discounts or games bundled.

You are once again making definitive claims without having any info to base them on.

Well how about this then?
Rather than only using ambiguous terms like 'destroying' in sales related topics, we try to specify what we mean exactly.

This is pretty much how every argument with him happens, he makes these exaggerated claims like "Switch will fall off a cliff" or "Smash wont be that big" and many posts later clarifies that he actually meant "Switch will be flat YOY" and "Smash will sell under 12 million".

We also had people saying PS4 would be above last year (over 20m) while Switch would be flat (13m).

But no, lets just pretend like that never happened and everybody thought Switch would destroy PS4.

It looks like a convenient threshold to define a lead as low as 800k as 'destroying', because that's still only 15%. 15% happens to be same as the PS4's lead in the month of March. It's doubtful that many people would say that the PS4 destroyed Switch and Xbox One this month.

More importantly though, you are falling into your habit of goalpost moving and backpedaling when you are wrong about something. That doesn't help your case at all. It's also only 40 of 86 predictions that have Switch ahead of the PS4 by at least 800k units. Furthermore, a gap of 800k units can be achieved in a single month, so in theory two consoles can split NPD wins for the first ten months of the year and one console can still come out with a lead if the console manufacturer in question goes to town with games, bundles and offers in the holiday season; therefore your conclusion that the ResetEra predictions must expect Switch to win nearly every month doesn't make much sense either.

The relevant question at this point is how deep you want to dig your hole.