Not all motion controls, as there are some cases where they're awful, but given the choice between playing Doom with amazing graphics and standard controls, or Switch graphics and the gyro-powered motion aiming this version offers, I'd choose the latter. I know this is probably a minority opinion, but the way I see it, it's just a matter of different horses for different courses, like how one person might like their coffee black and another person might prefer it with milk and sugar.

Graphics aside... The 30fps limit of the Switch is the real issue in my opinion.
A game like Doom needs 60fps for the gameplay and pacing to flow great.

But, how does the Xbox One X version look on the bus?

Well with mods you could put gyro on PC version.

There are buses with Big Screens and you could use it... still, I prefer to play on couch.

Can't say. Wasn't able to find a full priced Doom downgraded in both graphics and framerate and released several months later with less content than the original on the Xbox One X.

IF is the big point. They decided that X1X is this gen, and that is it. Nintendo decided to launch Switch not as a mid-gen upgrade, but next gen even if they kept their own idea of underpowered machine that they are using since Wii.

And funny enough even though you couldn't play the N64 and Genesis game without the add-on, you can play the same game on X1 that you play on X1X (so far 100% of them) so you could say that X1X is even more same gen of X1 than the Ram Boost and SegaCD or Sega32X.

Xbox division almost don't support X1 anyway, they barely release any game for it. But for their strategy they kept it on the same gen, so no point saying it could be a new gen if they wanted... if they wanted they could have released a console with the same power of X1 and say it's next gen as well (Wii was just 2x more powerful than GC, while WiiU and Switch can't even be stronger than the consoles that were on the gen before then on competitive companies).

And if you want to play IF cenarios, Nintendo could have made Switch gen 8 and totally compatible with WiiU back and forward as did MS and Sony with their mid gen upgrades or they could have launched stronger console.

There is no point in when you need to apologize for power say it's portable and when you have to apologize for let's say bad battery say it's because it is also a table console and other flip flops made between being one or another when wanting to praise or apologize for... it must have the cons and benefits of both sides, you can't just turn a blind eye and pretend there are only good sides and say the bad doesn't matter because sometimes it's hh and others console.

My point in saying Switch is a NVidia Shield is just to remove this interpretation that Switch is great and innovative because Nintendo made it.

The screen used on Switch is very cheap, so I don't see that as mattering, but sure remove the 30 bucks it add or even make the price bigger and say the price of X1X is double of Switch, doesn't change Switch is said by Nintendo fans to be 9th gen and is still weaker than gen 8... We could even use base X1 to compare since it is even cheaper than Switch (even if you had to buy a small screen to play it).

Sure X1X needs a screen, that is the purpose of home consoles and what a lot of people prefer anyway. Would you analyse the difference in price/performance between the streaming/cable TV/BD saying streaming is cheaper because you can use the cellphone you already have or the opposite that since a good cellphone cost a lot more than a cheap TV?

From the perspective of a PC gamer you could say the same thing about ANY home console. Indeed multiplats are always dreadful when compared to PC. On the other hand, Switch offers portability in those titles, meaning (IMO) you get better value for money, if you already own somewhat decent gaming PC and you're willing to double dip. In fact, that's the only convincible reason why would any PC (or not) gamer double dip. 

Comparing the performance of a tablet-sized portable, with screen, meant to also be able to run on a battery, to a desketop-sized, always plugged console - wich released later - on the basis of the first one being "9th gen" and the second being "8th" is beyond pointless. Videogame "Generation" is a technological non-factor on the face of size, tdp and release date.

The relevance when it comes to generations is the fact that both are bein sold at abouth the same time. In that sense, both seem pretty good for what they are and offer different advantages, trading of portability and graphical fidelity.

The $500 graphics are better than the $300 graphics. Are they 65% better? When you take your XBX in your Minivan to play on the go, are the graphics good on the ceiling screen? How good are the graphics when you play your XBX at the bus stop? At work? Waiting at the DMV? On a home 1080P TV?

Yeah, you would need some bolts and nuts too plus probably a good welding machine.