By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Next-Gen.biz Top 100 games in the past 12 months (US/PAL)

Woah, Forza 2 made it to 2 million un-bundled sales?





Current-gen game collection uploaded on the profile, full of win and good games; also most of my PC games. Lucasfilm Games/LucasArts 1982-2008 (Requiescat In Pace).

Around the Network

@ mrstickball

Huh? No way. HS is only 270k high while SMG and Brain Training 2 are over a million off.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Outlaw, think of context:

Although both are far off, they also sold millions more than HS. Percentage wise, HS is much farther off.

But either way, their all far too wrong. 25%+ off isn't acceptible.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

It's hard to really judge how accurate they are since they said they got some of their information from the publishers themselves. I'm assuming in those cases they would have been given shipped numbers.



The shipped vs. sold argument fails when the numbers are below VGChartz'



Currently playing on PS3: God of War III

Currently playing on Xbox360: Final Fantasy XIII

Currently playing on NDS: Chrono Trigger

Around the Network

I'm not saying it's the case for every number but in some of them where they do go to the publisher it could be.



All of this goes to show how bad many of the sources are for data.

I have been saying for quite a while that without tracking Wal-Mart and Toys R Us that NPD data can easily be called into question. In my opinion leads to an under-tracking of Wii games, PS2 games, and less hardcore fare in general (Toys R Us barely has space for PS3 and Wal-Mart has less space for PS3 than X360 or Wii).

Now you have a Next Gen Biz making an attempt at trying to derive a computation from tracking services and PR data. Interesting, but just as futile.

If the truth be known, we don't know how much many of these games ever truly sell. Though I guess it makes for good conversation.

To figure out what is the right number, you would have to take many of these on a case-by-cases basis. The potential overtracking of Wii RE4 has been discussed elsewhere (the EOY shipped number posted on the Capcom website was 200K less than the VGC sold number). Meanwhile, given that Toys R Us was basically selling Wii SMG for $25, I am sure that its non-inclusion in the NPD data (and NPD possibly using older estimation algorithms from last generation) has meant it is under-reported by the for-profit tracking services.

We should get a better idea as financial report information comes in.


Mike from Morgantown



      


I am Mario.


I like to jump around, and would lead a fairly serene and aimless existence if it weren't for my friends always getting into trouble. I love to help out, even when it puts me at risk. I seem to make friends with people who just can't stay out of trouble.

Wii Friend Code: 1624 6601 1126 1492

NNID: Mike_INTV

mike_intellivision said:
All of this goes to show how bad many of the sources are for data.

I have been saying for quite a while that without tracking Wal-Mart and Toys R Us that NPD data can easily be called into question. In my opinion leads to an under-tracking of Wii games, PS2 games, and less hardcore fare in general (Toys R Us barely has space for PS3 and Wal-Mart has less space for PS3 than X360 or Wii).

Now you have a Next Gen Biz making an attempt at trying to derive a computation from tracking services and PR data. Interesting, but just as futile.

If the truth be known, we don't know how much many of these games ever truly sell. Though I guess it makes for good conversation.

To figure out what is the right number, you would have to take many of these on a case-by-cases basis. The potential overtracking of Wii RE4 has been discussed elsewhere (the EOY shipped number posted on the Capcom website was 200K less than the VGC sold number). Meanwhile, given that Toys R Us was basically selling Wii SMG for $25, I am sure that its non-inclusion in the NPD data (and NPD possibly using older estimation algorithms from last generation) has meant it is under-reported by the for-profit tracking services.

We should get a better idea as financial report information comes in.


Mike from Morgantown


NPD gets sales data from between 60-65% of all retailers in the U.S. so it's hard to believe they would be too inaccurate.  As for Toys R' Us, NPD has their sales data up to the end of September 2007 so it's likely they have a good idea what percentage of sales a Wii or PS2 game would get from there.

As for the numbers in the list we'll probably never know who's more accurate as they also had to rely on different sources to try to piece together and estimate how many copies were sold.



mrstickball, where is the VGChartz 's top 100 Worldwide(NA,JPN,PAL) games???? PC sales not included will be fine for me.

I think we can have something like this.(this is last year stuff)
http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4691&Itemid=2
The top 100 list.
The analysis.
The review scores in vgchartz.



Poor PS3 Sales Means Smaller Losses

"Actually, because the number of units sold was not as high as we hoped, the loss was better than our original expectation," Quotes from Sony’s CFO Nobuyuki Oneda.

ioi said:

Hang on a sec. Is someone seriously trying to use this list to in some way discredit VG Chartz numbers? And Mrstickball of all people - I'd expect better from you.

Wow, where do we start with this comical list from NG.biz, which by the sound of it most of the European numbers are just guesses based on US numbers and maybe a few chart positions in the UK.

Is it even worth me going through this list one-by-one and arguing for each game or do you want to trust me that this "top 100 sellers" is hugely inaccurate?


The numbers sounded so off I didn't even bother responding to this thread.

I just feel bad for the people who spent their time making these numbers up.