Sounds like a very promising DLC, I definitely like that!
How long is it? Future buy for sure.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| DonFerrari said: How long is it? Future buy for sure. |
15 hours. It tells you in the vid.
The PS5 Exists.
GribbleGrunger said:
15 hours. It tells you in the vid. |
I usually don't play YT.
15h for the DLC is great way to recycle the content on like 6 months and sell us a good and lenght game for a good price.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
I'm sorry, but I just don't really believe this. After the critical acclaim of games like Dark Souls and The Witcher 3 from a DLC standpoint, people are too quick to advertise ever DLC as an "expansion" or "practically it's own game".
15 hours of content is roughly half of my play time of the game, in which I completed pretty much everything in the game aside from maybe a few quest lines. About 8 of those hours were spent on the story, which ended up being terrible by the end of the game.
In order to have that much content it would have to be more than just one big area. It's probably mostly recycled content, or somewhat long main quests.
really amazing what guerilla did with that game, a great dlc, we can only hope they come up with a amazing sequel. and with 15 hours to play seems like a new own game
| AngryLittleAlchemist said: I'm sorry, but I just don't really believe this. After the critical acclaim of games like Dark Souls and The Witcher 3 from a DLC standpoint, people are too quick to advertise ever DLC as an "expansion" or "practically it's own game". 15 hours of content is roughly half of my play time of the game, in which I completed pretty much everything in the game aside from maybe a few quest lines. About 8 of those hours were spent on the story, which ended up being terrible by the end of the game. In order to have that much content it would have to be more than just one big area. It's probably mostly recycled content, or somewhat long main quests. |
So we know they are lying before the game is out or they made a very compelling expansion?
And I have expansions as long ago as Warcraft II, there are probably a lot even before that.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
So we know they are lying before the game is out or they made a very compelling expansion? And I have expansions as long ago as Warcraft II, there are probably a lot even before that. |
You don't have to see things in such a black and white way for the sake of being argumentative. I'm just skeptical, it's not like I'm claiming I know the exact amount of content that will be available.
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
You don't have to see things in such a black and white way for the sake of being argumentative. I'm just skeptical, it's not like I'm claiming I know the exact amount of content that will be available. |
Being skeptical is good. 15h would be fantastic, even 4h for a DLC is already quite good.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
