By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
I'm sorry, but I just don't really believe this. After the critical acclaim of games like Dark Souls and The Witcher 3 from a DLC standpoint, people are too quick to advertise ever DLC as an "expansion" or "practically it's own game".

15 hours of content is roughly half of my play time of the game, in which I completed pretty much everything in the game aside from maybe a few quest lines. About 8 of those hours were spent on the story, which ended up being terrible by the end of the game.

In order to have that much content it would have to be more than just one big area. It's probably mostly recycled content, or somewhat long main quests.

So we know they are lying before the game is out or they made a very compelling expansion?

And I have expansions as long ago as Warcraft II, there are probably a lot even before that.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."