Hiku said:
Here's the thing though. If you join our conversation with the sole intent of adding nothing but personal insults, or theories about why I said what I said, the least you can do is respond to everything I said. There are some things in my previous post that you ignored, that adress some of the things you brought up here. You don't have to go back to that post now because I re-introduced some of those points here again. But I'd apreciate if you don't glaze over 90% of it again and act as if I never said them. Just like how I want to understand the OP, and for others to understand him better, I want to be clear about my thought process as well.
|
You can try and explain a theoretical motive all you want. What I'm saying is you were acting as if you couldn't see the moving sides when clearly they were moving, that's it! I don't care about WHY you would do it, just that you did it... If you are going to just say you couldn't understand because he was too vague for you to understand, then fine, hard to believe, but accepted.
The first post was vague, the second was incredibly revealing yet you didn't pick up on it, and the third post you again didn't pick up on what he meant but then all of a sudden you did then you slough it off in what seems to be an effort to conceal anything that may be wrong with the game.
My sole purpose was not to add insult. I actually told you that you weren't stupid enough to not be able to see the sides and that you were just acting, which may be construed as insulting as well but what that was not the sole purpose. It's called a callout. I was calling you out on the disacknowledged approach you took in regards to the moving sides. People get called out sometimes. And no, I'm not going to repsond to everything you said when I have no interest in everything else you said, sorry!