Kerotan said:
We don't even know the situation. Shitty witch hunt without any evidence. |
Yeah, so you don't know what a witch hunt is LOL.
Kerotan said:
We don't even know the situation. Shitty witch hunt without any evidence. |
Yeah, so you don't know what a witch hunt is LOL.
| Snoopy said: Sony and Naughty dog are innocent until proven guilty. |
Finally a post of yours that I agree with xD
| DivinePaladin said: I think there's a lot left to this story that's going to come out over time, if it is in fact a story. The moment PlayStation's HR got involved is the moment I started speculating. It's a shame to say, but in many US companies the HR acts to protect the company, not the workers. I can absolutely see things playing out as it did, with both sides technically telling the truth - if the HR rep blew a whistle, then he/she wouldn't have kept a record; ND would have no record because PlayStation was involved already; all the while this man may have been sexually harassed, and presumably by a lead high enough up that the PlayStation HR rep felt it more important to protect Uncharted 4's upcoming launch, ND, and by extension Sony by escalating this quickly. This all sounds like conspiracy obviously, and I'm not fond of speculating this much, but it's food for thought on an issue where people are already drawing battle lines for some reason |
HR stands for Human Resources; they’re common across all corporations. It is their job to handle sevrance packages. It’s not at all weird that they’re involved with this, it’s standard procedure - not a conspiracy.
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.
| PhatChips said: Of course they wouldn't say there is evidence. They were trying to bribe that guy after all. |
A standard severance agreement is not a bribe. It’s typical corporate policy, and the law in many countries for severance to be offered.
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.
Well if a phone call is all he has to go on, then its going to be an uphill battle. Hope he has some kind of evidence if it really happened though.
| PhatChips said: Of course they wouldn't say there is evidence. They were trying to bribe that guy after all. |
can you share the evidence that convinced you?
any sexual harassment claims either true or false has detrimental effects. the damage is done

Madword said:
Its common in the industry when you want to get rid of someone (mostly someone who you dont want to work for the company because they are a problem employee) you offer then salary x so many months (I've seen it happen in the UK at two different companies - not me but others, so I guess this could happen in the USA). Personally 20K is high, but apparently whats being said over at Neogaf this is quite a normal amount as it can take into account other factors such as time in Lieu etc. Dont know why people assume that sony are paying him off, they could have just been trying to get him out of the company. The guy said himself he was having a breakdown, doesnt sound like an employee around if they are in that state. Not saying this is right or wrong, but there is so much in the air, too many people making assumptions one way or another. |
Uh, he said he was having a breakdown because he was being sexually harrassed. There's as little evidence to suggest that he was a 'problem employee' as there is for anything else, so attemting to play down his own accord by twisting his own words isn't helping the situation any.
You, or 'people on neogaf' went through way bigger leaps of assumptions, to make Dave Ballard seem like an implicit liar, then I ever did when I basically said: If there's any truth to his story, they would not admit to that in an official PR statement.
And even if he was just having a regular old breakdown in an industry that is rife with bad working conditions, no security, exploitation of employees and the suitably mystified 'crunch' and their respose to a mental health issue is: 'take money and get lost', they are still scumbags.
Wich doesn't change that all of this is speculation.
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
"unfortunately" So you're assuming there's something to go further with? It's not unfortunate if this was a false accusation. It should end here IF that's the case. |
No, I use the words 'unforunately' because either ND's name will never be cleared or justice will never be had if a sexual harrassment had taken place.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'
We in the world where people say don't believe everything on the internet..........than someone accuses someone of something I've the internet and an angry mob who's gotten no evidence comes out to attack the accused lol
Guess people didn't get the memo growing up
Preston Scott