Wyrdness said:
My mistake 2, point still stands. |
Not really, but whatever...
KLXVER said:
Not really, but whatever... |
Yes really, you and the person you're championing have not given one reason why the game isn't a 10 which is the foundation of your argument as you're arguing a deal was made to give the game a 10 regardless of quality. It's also simple business sense to get an early copy out for a huge outlet that has a monthly release date 2 weeks prior.
So again start by telling us in detail why the game is not a 10.
My god, KLXVER, do you actually read the posts you reply to?
Wyrdness said:
Yes really, you and the person you're championing have not given one reason why the game isn't a 10 which is the foundation of your argument as you're arguing a deal was made to give the game a 10 regardless of quality. It's also simple business sense to get an early copy out for a huge outlet that has a monthly release date 2 weeks prior. So again start by telling us in detail why the game is not a 10. |
Its not about the score FFS. Its about Nintendo cherry picking who gets to review their games.
| NintendoPie said: My god, KLXVER, do you actually read the posts you reply to? |
I do. Whats troubling you, little one?
KLXVER said:
Its not about the score FFS. Its about Nintendo cherry picking who gets to review their games. |
How can they cherry pick when everyone has a review copy? If they were cherry picking how come Metroid and other games don't get 10s?
Wyrdness said:
How can they cherry pick when everyone has a review copy? If they were cherry picking how come Metroid and other games don't get 10s? |
What?
Do you honestly think EDGE would have a SMO review in this issue if they gave it a 7?
No one is saying Ninteno or EDGE paid for anything here.
RolStoppable said:
Why should EDGE not be allowed to print their review until two weeks after the game's release? |
I dont know. Why are they reviewing Metroid: Samus Returns from September 15th in their october issue?
KLXVER said:
What? Do you honestly think EDGE would have a SMO review in this issue if they gave it a 7? No one is saying Ninteno or EDGE paid for anything here. |
Yes they would all other reviews are going to be out before the game's release as well are you going to argue they all got copies because of a deal as well.
RolStoppable said:
Because the game didn't meet the deadline for the September issue and there was no sense of urgency from anyone. |
Maybe...or maybe the perfect 10 had something to do wih it. Its not impossible.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
