AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Miyamotoo did too He literally made an entire thread about it |
Thats not true, I always stated that Switch is hybrid, I made thread to point that Switch isn't just a handheld.
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Miyamotoo did too He literally made an entire thread about it |
Thats not true, I always stated that Switch is hybrid, I made thread to point that Switch isn't just a handheld.
Miyamotoo said:
Thats not true, I always stated that Switch is hybrid, I made thread to point that Switch isn't just a handheld. |
Right, but you pretty much made an entire thread to downplay it's success as a handheld. You can pretend like you didn't but you did, anyone can go back and look at your thread. Context and wording is more important than a synopsis.
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Right, but you pretty much made an entire thread to downplay it's success as a handheld. You can pretend like you didn't but you did, anyone can go back and look at your thread. Context and wording is more important than a synopsis. |
My point was simple, Switch is not selling just because it's handheld, but because fact that has much bigger value like hybrid of home console and handheld, than it would if its just $300 handheld. Maybe I used some bad wording in thread, but that was hole my point.
Miyamotoo said:
My point was simple, Switch is not selling just because it's handheld, but because fact that has much bigger value like hybrid of home console and handheld, than it would if its just $300 handheld. |
You've literally made posts in the past trying to go against any momentum the Switch has due to being a handheld device. I've already stated this but i'll say it again, trying to pin the Switch on selling for being a hybrid but *not* for being a handheld is contradictory and doesn't make any sense. The Switch only benefits as a handheld because of specs, pixel density, and sales of handheld Nintendo consoles. Honestly, do you think if you told someone on this forum that the Switch is selling because it's a hybrid people would have a problem with it? No. Context matters. That's not the problem, the problem is you discount any advantage it has from being a handheld. Again I don't have to lie, there's an entire thread about it.
I'll say it again, the Switch is selling best in regions where handhelds is loved ... as a handheld. In regions where home consoles perform best, it will sell best there. In regions where both succeed, it's selling well and potentially could increase Nintendo's reach. I'm not going to argue about this again, because this is entirely a you problem and not a "Switch is selling as a hybrid" problem.
Kyuu said:
Jeez.. what's with all the drama? :( |
Anything wrong with that?
People are comparing Switch sales and related things to PS4, 3DS, DS, and Wii U and more.
Pocky Lover Boy!

AngryLittleAlchemist said:
You've literally made posts in the past trying to go against any momentum the Switch has due to being a handheld device. I've already stated this but i'll say it again, trying to pin the Switch on selling for being a hybrid but *not* for being a handheld is contradictory and doesn't make any sense. The Switch only benefits as a handheld because of specs, pixel density, and sales of handheld Nintendo consoles. Honestly, do you think if you told someone on this forum that the Switch is selling because it's a hybrid people would have a problem with it? No. Context matters. That's not the problem, the problem is you discount any advantage it has from being a handheld. Again I don't have to lie, there's an entire thread about it. I'll say it again, the Switch is selling best in regions where handhelds is loved ... as a handheld. In regions where home consoles perform best, it will sell best there. In regions where both succeed, it's selling well and potentially could increase Nintendo's reach. I'm not going to argue about this again, because this is entirely a you problem and not a "Switch is selling as a hybrid" problem. |
You are wrong, again, offcourse that in Japan biggest reason why Switch is selling is handheld side, but also, high value of Switch like hybrid system. Again, my point (inlcuding thread thatI made) is that Switch is not selling just because it's handheld, but because fact that has much bigger value like hybrid of home console and handheld, than it would if its just $300 handheld.
Miyamotoo said:
You are wrong, again, offcourse that in Japan biggest reason why Switch is selling is handheld side, but also, high value of Switch like hybrid system. Again, my point (inlcuding thread thatI made) is that Switch is not selling just because it's handheld, but because fact that has much bigger value like hybrid of home console and handheld, than it would if its just $300 handheld. |
You say that but stuff in your own thread completely disgregards the handheld aspect, like how you said the Switch would not sell if it was just a handheld(I agree it's potential would be much lower but that's just not true). Again, this is what you do anytime someone says you're wrong. You just start with "you are wrong again" or "lier lier pants on fire" and then just restate what you said originally. Ok, disregard context. All I'm saying is you've done it before, even hinting at the fact that Switch is selling better as a home console("cause it's 300 dollars and no one would buy a super powerful handheld at 300, right guys?"). I have the opinion based on what you've written yourself that you have downplayed it's success as a handheld to make it seem more successful and comparable as a successful home console, just to make the success more impressive. I don't care what you restate, a synposis or summary is not needed. I have that opinion, it's my opinion and I'm keeping it. Many people seemed to agree with it. Move on.
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
You say that but stuff in your own thread completely disgregards the handheld aspect, like how you said the Switch would not sell if it was just a handheld(I agree it's potential would be much lower but that's just not true). Again, this is what you do anytime someone says you're wrong. You just start with "you are wrong again" or "lier lier pants on fire" and then just restate what you said originally. Ok, disregard context. All I'm saying is you've done it before, even hinting at the fact that Switch is selling better as a home console("cause it's 300 dollars and no one would buy a super powerful handheld at 300, right guys?"). I have the opinion based on what you've written yourself that you have downplayed it's success as a handheld to make it seem more successful and comparable as a successful home console, just to make the success more impressive. I don't care what you restate, a synposis or summary is not needed. I have that opinion, it's my opinion and I'm keeping it. Many people seemed to agree with it. Move on. |
But if Switch is just a $300 handheld, sales would defiantly be lower. I never said that Switch is home console, again, I always saying thats hybrid. And you are wrong about my thread, this is directly from my thread, bottom of line and bolded: "So no, Switch is not selling great because "it's just another Nintendo handheld and they always sell well", Switch is selling because great concept (with its hybrid nature where is a handheld and home console in same time), great system seller games and good marketing".
You can have your opinion of course, but stick to facts. I already wrote what originaly was my point, and that maybe I used poor wording in some parts of my thread, but you ignoring that beacuse "you have opinon". Now you are free to move on.
| Miyamotoo said: But if Switch is just a $300 handheld, sales would defiantly be lower. I never said that Switch is home console, again, I always saying thats hybrid. And you are wrong about my thread, this is directly from my thread, bottom of line and bolded: "So no, Switch is not selling great because "it's just another Nintendo handheld and they always sell well", Switch is selling because great concept (with its hybrid nature where is a handheld and home console in same time), great system seller games and good marketing". You can have your opinion of course, but stick to facts. I already wrote what originaly was my point, and that maybe I used poor wording in some parts of my thread, but you ignoring that beacuse "you have opinon". Now you are free to move on. |
But that is part of the reason it's selling. It's just not the reason why it could potentially sell Wii numbers.
I'm not going to have you just say complete nonsense and then tell me goodbye and have a good day.
I'll admit though, I don't know verbatim what was in your thread and what was in other threads, because you said similar things on a lot of threads, in fact the only reason you made that thread was because someone was arguing with you on another thread minutes earlier.
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
But that is part of the reason it's selling. It's just not the reason why it could potentially sell Wii numbers. I'm not going to have you just say complete nonsense and then tell me goodbye and have a good day. I'll admit though, I don't know verbatim what was in your thread and what was in other threads, because you said similar things on a lot of threads, in fact the only reason you made that thread was because someone was arguing with you on another thread minutes earlier. |
Yes, its part, and my point is thats a part, that isnt only reson why is selling.
Whats exatly complete nonsense that I wrote!?
I used some bad wording in that thread when I made it, and I edited some parts of OP shortly after I made that thread.