AngryLittleAlchemist said:
You say that but stuff in your own thread completely disgregards the handheld aspect, like how you said the Switch would not sell if it was just a handheld(I agree it's potential would be much lower but that's just not true). Again, this is what you do anytime someone says you're wrong. You just start with "you are wrong again" or "lier lier pants on fire" and then just restate what you said originally. Ok, disregard context. All I'm saying is you've done it before, even hinting at the fact that Switch is selling better as a home console("cause it's 300 dollars and no one would buy a super powerful handheld at 300, right guys?"). I have the opinion based on what you've written yourself that you have downplayed it's success as a handheld to make it seem more successful and comparable as a successful home console, just to make the success more impressive. I don't care what you restate, a synposis or summary is not needed. I have that opinion, it's my opinion and I'm keeping it. Many people seemed to agree with it. Move on. |
But if Switch is just a $300 handheld, sales would defiantly be lower. I never said that Switch is home console, again, I always saying thats hybrid. And you are wrong about my thread, this is directly from my thread, bottom of line and bolded: "So no, Switch is not selling great because "it's just another Nintendo handheld and they always sell well", Switch is selling because great concept (with its hybrid nature where is a handheld and home console in same time), great system seller games and good marketing".
You can have your opinion of course, but stick to facts. I already wrote what originaly was my point, and that maybe I used poor wording in some parts of my thread, but you ignoring that beacuse "you have opinon". Now you are free to move on.
