Kyuu said:
Nautilus said:
Nobody is trying to pass it a home console to make it seem like its a bigger success than it is.We are just stating what the Switch is, which is a hybrid.It can be played as a normal home console, on a screen, while you sit on the couch.Or can beplayed as a handheld, which you can bring whener you go.
I dont undersatnd why people want to keep pressing this narrative of "Switch is obviuosly a handheld".My god, is it really that hard to see?I mean, you can considder it as a handheld or a home console, since you can play exclusively as one or the other.Thats your option.But the Switch is clearly a hybrid, since it has the function of both.
I feel like this misconception will prolong itself for some years, until the Switch, or its conception, becomes a norm.
|
Jeez.. what's with all the drama? :(
I've already explained myself, call the Switch whatever name that puts a smile on your face. Jrantation literally called it a "Home console and not a portable" so he can compare to the PS2 lol.
As far as the hardware goes, the Switch is essentially a phablet. Nintendo's approach is different this time because they no longer make home consoles. So they made some design adjustments and provided the tools to make it easy to play on a TV.
If you define hybrid by playing on TV from your couch, then I guess original Vita too is a hybrid. Seeing as you can also connect it to a TV and enjoy your games on a bigger screen. Yes, you don't quite get the same "home console experience" that you get with the Switch.. but that's due to game design and development costs that are unrelated to any advantage Switch (as a piece of hardware) would have over a similarily spec'd portable.
I agree it's a hybrid in the sense that it ultimately delivers home console like experinece. But the hardware itself is really just a powerful handheld with a little twist. Not that there is anything wrong with this. It's one magnificent portable.
Switch's advantage is what Nintendo chose to use it for. Not the detachable joycons or the dock that connects you to the TV.
|
Theere is no drama here.Im just trying to clear this misconception about the Switch.If you see a nice conversation as a drama, its because you want to see it as one.
Now, it should be noted that exceptions should be excluded.There will be always people that are too enthusiastic about their consoles of choice for their own good, like Jranation, Kerotan and Dr. Vita.It should go without saying that, outside of a few situations, they will always try to spin the news and information in their favor.
Having said that, the Switch is clearly a hybrid.I dont understand how people cannot understand this.You can see it as a handheld or a home console in the sense that you use exclusively as it is, but the console is designed to be both.Being a home console or a handheld is not defined by where the main hardware is, as one user believes, but rather how that hardware is used and is designed to be used.The problem with your Vita example is that first of all, when you buy a vita it doestn come with a Vita TV.Its two separate products.If you classify that as a hybrid product, I could say the same about PCs and laptops.If I have both, would that then make my PC a hybrid?Of course not.Second point is that the Vita TV is a half assed product.I dont mean in the sense that games doesnt feel like a home console experience, but rather that the hardware itself is not up to snuff, as in very few games actually work with it.
For the Switch though, its the complete oposite.Both its sidesare considered equaly.It was designed as such from the get go.Its not a handheld, its not a home console, and not even a tablet(If the form a product defined what it was, definition of a word nowadays would be such a choes lol).It is,what is is because ofhow it was designed to do things and not by its form factor or by how much teraflops it has.