By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - President Trump Threatens to "Totally Destroy" North Korea.

can anybody link me some live footage of kim jong il threatening to actually nuke the states? and i don't mean footage of a reporter reading that off a teleprompter

i mean the man giving a speech about what he will do to the united states



Around the Network

All fun and games until the nuke lands Trump.



Personally, I have nothing wrong with the one statement that we will retaliate with everything we got if NK decides to escalate things any further. This point I totally agree with Trump. My problem as always with Trump is that when speaking to groups of nations he has to use stupid belittling language like Rocket Man, we really do not need the grade school name calling. It makes him look simple when presenting something very serious and dangerous when he resort to that type of language.



o_O.Q said:
cmay227 said:

If your neighbor beats his wife and kids every night and you know it's happening, do you just sit back and turn a blind eye? The US and the UN as a whole. feels it has a obligation to help defend those who can't defend themselves from power hungry leaders of other shitty countries who rule by oppression and fear. You can be the guy who watches your neighbor eventually kill his family or his family kill him. Or try to intervene and remove the issue from the situation. By any means necessary with a attack being the last resort. The US as a country has give more money to other countries as well as aid in many forms,then it does in its own backyard. 

it saddens me that you actually believe that bullshit when you have evidence of the contrary...

 

so... uh is a better alternative to drop a bomb on your neighbours house and kill them both in other to help the abuse victim? that sounds stupid right? well what has the us been doing for the past decade?

 

where are the weapons of mass destruction? lol

So all your referring to is the Iraq war. I forgot what a great leader saddam was to his people and the world.  The U.S. attacked a great and wonderful man. So you don't give 2 shits what happens to other people as long as it doesn't effect you?  And to blame terrorist on America is just plain dumb. Sorry to inform you but people like that have been around a lot longer then the U.S. has. It's not like Iraq ever invaded Kuwait or killed their people or hated their leader to the point of hanging him.



Superman4 said:
o_O.Q said:

what's funny about this whole situation is that supposedly its because north korean is arming itself with nukes....

the united states is the only country in the world to use a nuclear bomb on another country... and as i just said has been the country by a large margin most involved in perpetuating unprovoked attacks on other nations

Yeah, thats a bullshit statement. Yes we are the only ones to use one against someone, that is the reason the world understands that it isnt a viable option anymore. Yes the US is involved in a lot of things I dont feel we should be but we dont start conflicts. When we are attacked we attack back, sometimes at more than we should.

"Yes the US is involved in a lot of things I dont feel we should be but we dont start conflicts."

 

if the us doesn't start conflicts ( bullshit ) how do you get involved in things you shouldn't be involved in?

 

what happened with iraq? or lybia? or syria? how was the united states attacked first in any of those wars?



Around the Network
cmay227 said:
o_O.Q said:

it saddens me that you actually believe that bullshit when you have evidence of the contrary...

 

so... uh is a better alternative to drop a bomb on your neighbours house and kill them both in other to help the abuse victim? that sounds stupid right? well what has the us been doing for the past decade?

 

where are the weapons of mass destruction? lol

So all your referring to is the Iraq war. I forgot what a great leader saddam was to his people and the world.  The U.S. attacked a great and wonderful man. So you don't give 2 shits what happens to other people as long as it doesn't effect you?  And to blame terrorist on America is just plain dumb. Sorry to inform you but people like that have been around a lot longer then the U.S. has. It's not like Iraq ever invaded Kuwait or killed their people or hated their leader to the point of hanging him.

first off the us put saddam in power 

 

and i use iraq because that's the most obvious example where millions of people died (which you seem to think isn't a big deal i guess)

 

"And to blame terrorist on America is just plain dumb."

 

well not if you fund them, arm them and train them

 



The only message this sends to "Rocket Man" is that the nuclear program of NK must be accelerated and given more importance.



Machiavellian said:
Personally, I have nothing wrong with the one statement that we will retaliate with everything we got if NK decides to escalate things any further. This point I totally agree with Trump. My problem as always with Trump is that when speaking to groups of nations he has to use stupid belittling language like Rocket Man, we really do not need the grade school name calling. It makes him look simple when presenting something very serious and dangerous when he resort to that type of language.

You know that probably one of the reasons he got ellect is because he talks without subterfuge or using difficult words to mean the same? It is very idiotic when two politicians do namecalling and personal attacks using words of false respect.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

o_O.Q said:
Superman4 said:

Yeah, thats a bullshit statement. Yes we are the only ones to use one against someone, that is the reason the world understands that it isnt a viable option anymore. Yes the US is involved in a lot of things I dont feel we should be but we dont start conflicts. When we are attacked we attack back, sometimes at more than we should.

"Yes the US is involved in a lot of things I dont feel we should be but we dont start conflicts."

 

if the us doesn't start conflicts ( bullshit ) how do you get involved in things you shouldn't be involved in?

 

what happened with iraq? or lybia? or syria? how was the united states attacked first in any of those wars?

We didnt start the Iraq war, we didnt start the Afghanistan war etc. Lybia, Syria, Iraq etc. were all fighting their own battles and murdering people by the thousands. We picked a side. When we were attacked twice at the World Trade Center site we decided to fight back. I dont feel that we need to be involved in a lot of what we are, I dont think that we need to have bases all around the world or supply countries with weapons. We are also not the only ones doing so. N Korea poses a threat to everyone, not just the US. It has already commited an act of war by firing two missles at Japan, how do we know they meant to miss? 



Superman4 said:
o_O.Q said:

"Yes the US is involved in a lot of things I dont feel we should be but we dont start conflicts."

 

if the us doesn't start conflicts ( bullshit ) how do you get involved in things you shouldn't be involved in?

 

what happened with iraq? or lybia? or syria? how was the united states attacked first in any of those wars?

We didnt start the Iraq war, we didnt start the Afghanistan war etc. Lybia, Syria, Iraq etc. were all fighting their own battles and murdering people by the thousands. We picked a side. When we were attacked twice at the World Trade Center site we decided to fight back. I dont feel that we need to be involved in a lot of what we are, I dont think that we need to have bases all around the world or supply countries with weapons. We are also not the only ones doing so. N Korea poses a threat to everyone, not just the US. It has already commited an act of war by firing two missles at Japan, how do we know they meant to miss? 

So how did the united states get involved in the wars in iraq, lybia and syria? are you saying those countries were responsible for the world trade attacks?

 

". N Korea poses a threat to everyone, not just the US. It has already commited an act of war by firing two missles at Japan, how do we know they meant to miss? "

 

the united states for the past few decades fired and hit targets in the countries i mentioned above among others... following your logic the united states is a far bigger threat to  any country in the world than north korea right?

 

oh and another thing, the united states is currently involved in a war in syria right? 

 

so if north korea comes along and attacks the u s then that's ok according to your logic right?