AbbathTheGrim said:
If de-escalating the situation is entering negotiations that lead the US to leave there, nothing is stopping NK from threatening an invasion of the South by menace of nuclear warfare.
|
I highly doubt the North could integrate the South.
Once an entire country has tasted such economic, social and cultural freedom... It is not always easy to take that away, especially when your entire ability to stay in power is to attack the very foundations of information and education.
Qwark said: No, because China won't tolerate that and such an action might have dire consequences eve though they will be mostly economical. |
Pretty much everything rests on China's shoulders.
A war with North Korea would be far to costly if China backs North Korea.
North Korea would also have the support of countries like Russia, Bulgaria and probably other dictatorships in the area.
We already went down this path once before.
Flilix said:
Kim Jung Un is someone who's easily offended, so we should be smart and diplomatic. |
You do realise who is running the USA right now, right?
Zkuq said:
South Korea and possibly Japan would take most of the damage caused by the war
|
That is provided the North can get around South Koreas and Japans defenses.
I think people forget that North Korea is like over half a century behind the rest of the world in technology terms, which does give defense systems a big advantage.
CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:
Guess what? The USSR never attacked. No point doing what-ifs, the reality is that it never happened. And North Korea is nowhere near the military power that the Soviet Union was.
|
They still have the USSR's resilience and psychotic desire to kill us for no reason, which are enough on their own.
|
The only real threat North Korea has is their bombs/missiles and artillery.
And they can be mitigated to a degree with defense systems like Iron Dome. - The big advantage there is that the North isn't particularly advanced so cannot load up it's missiles with stealth technology to bypass that.
The Military itself isn't the best trained due to lack of a decent education system which means they are pretty ignorant on modern military tactics and technology.
They do have numbers... But South Koreas automated defenses would tear them a new one if they attempted a zerg rush.
Stellar_Fungk said:
My philosophy is like this: Just because Japan is an ally (forced because they were nuked) doesn't mean that its people mean more to me than Norrh Korea's. Civilians are civilians. They should not be judged by how their regime behave. You can call me naive but that's what I think.
|
In this case. The USA does have a mutual defensive agreement with Japan, Australia, South Korea, New Zealand, Canada, Philippines, large swathe of Europe, Thailand, United Kingdom and so on...
So if the North Korea attacks any of those parties... Then it doesn't matter how you feel. The Regime will be judged and action will be taken, if there happens to be casualties of war, then there will be casualties of war, it's a sad reality of life in general.
CaptainExplosion said:
Most countries, as far as I know, don't testfire atomic weaponry at other countries. You're acting like the United States is constantly doing the same thing to Mexico.
|
North Korea wasn't testing Nuclear Weapons over Japan. They were testing their long-range missile technology.
Lucas-Rio said:
Admit it and deal with your own country instead of building military bases all around the world. |
The USA has mutual defense obligations.
For instance the American military trains with the Australian military here... And both Militaries gain new tactics and such.
Soundwave said:
2.) Even for the "Dumb American" trope person who doesn't care about Korean lives lost ... you do realize there are like 50,000 Americans in in the area right, most living in Seoul. The death toll for American civilians in such an attack could likely be more than 9/11 and Pearl Harbor combined. Think about that for a second.
3.) Seoul is not just "kind of big city". It's the 3rd or 4th largest city in the world population wise, it's basically like New York City. Imagine trying to evacuate a city the size of New York in 20-30 minutes.
|
1) They wouldn't evacuate the city.
2) South Korea has defense systems to mitigate the missile and artillary threat.
3) South Korea has advanced warning systems in place and the city is littered with easily accessible bomb shelters.
Remember there is a stupidly massive technological divide between the North and the South.
shokenchi said: US will topple the North Korean regime if it is ready to do so. Why this has not happened? Because Kim dynasty is smart in developing long range missiles as a deterrent. |
No. It is because of China.
In-case you aren't aware... China has been investing and building up it's army... Which has been propelled thanks to it's incredible growth fueled by it's industrial revolution... Which means it's sphere of influence has grown and will continue to grow.
A country... Even the USA just can't do whatever it desires in that sphere.
Especially as China would have the support of countries like Russia on top of it.
Arminillo said:
North Korea is Chinas only ally in that area, US is buddy buddy with Japan and South Korea, China will never abandon NK unless they did a direct strike on US mainland.
|
North Korea shares a border with Russia.
You can bet your ass Russia will throw it's support behind North Korea just to spite the USA.
Ruler said:
It isnt terrible, go to any third world country and you will find people who have less freedom and prosperity than in North Korea.
|
Can you point me to another country that would murder someone and their entire family just because they have a western movie on a VHS tape?
Locknuts said: It's looking increasingly necessary. They have made it quite clear what they would do if they had the power. Now it looks like they're close to being able to nuke the US mainland. They will try to extort money from the US and its allies under threat of nuclear war. If anyone gives in, it will make matters worse. |
It's terrorism.