Ruler said:
NK wont strike first, the US is the agressor here with all their sanctions and military maneuvers , NK is reacting |
NK struck first in 1950.
Go back to defending ISIS, Ruler. You were more amusing then.
DialgaMarine said:
At this point, I would not be surprised if China's stance, on taking NK's side if we attack first, is just a bluff in itself. China is so heavily tied to us, whereas NK has become nothing more a debt to them. I believe that's just their way of trying to prevent NK from detonating a warhead so close their border, but if we attacked first, I think China would hang back. That being said though, I still disagree with a preemptive strike. NK has been blowing smoke up our asses since the cease-fire was signed. This is nothing new. They know the second they harm a hair on either us or our allies that they're done. |
Never underestimate the power of stupidity. This is Kim Jong Un's North Korea, not Il's or Sung's. That said, all we can most optimally do is react, not act so as not to draw the ire of China and Russia. Let's get Japan and South Korea to build up their military to the distaste of China, not that China can rationally do anything about it: it would be North Korea's doing that would be empowering US allies to build up their military.







