By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - Persona 5 is almost perfect now on PC using latest version of RPCS3.

VGPolyglot said:
Cerebralbore101 said:

Platinum games were all third party multiplats. 

Digital novels are the bread and butter of PC in Japan. 

Most Final Fantasy games didn't come until over a decade after their initial release. 

Guess what? There's already been a Persona game released on PC before

That was already covered. Final Fantasy VII and Persona both got PC releases in the late 90's. They then proceeded to drop off the face of PC for over a decade. Square only recently put the rest of the Final Fantasy games on PC. Not to mention that was a Japan only thing. There's no European or U.S. version of Persona 1 on PC. At least not officially. 



Around the Network
Cerebralbore101 said:
Zkuq said:

As far as I can see, Wikipedia actually states the latest state of affairs and the fair use portion. Also, fair use isn't limited to those situations. Specifically, the following points might apply in this case: Pro-tip: Read the whole thing.

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Sorry I missed this. Too many replies coming in all at once. 

In that case fair use is so poorly defined that virtually any amount of copyright infringement can be successfully defended as "fair use" in a court of law. 

From your link: Although the courts have considered and ruled upon the fair use doctrine over and over again, no real definition of the concept has ever emerged. Indeed, since the doctrine is an equitable rule of reason, no generally applicable definition is possible, and each case raising the question must be decided on its own facts.

Hey courts is the use of an API fair use? 

Courts: Yes. Wait I mean no. Wait I mean yes. 

Could you define fair use for us?

Courts: Nope! We have no clue what it means. 

No problem! I know the feeling when you get a lot of replies, many of them against you.

I don't think fair use is used to justify a lot of copyright infringements, so it doesn't seem to cause problems. I agree that its definition is vague, though, and should probably be better. It's a tough thing to define though, because it feels like you'd have to go into concrete cases where something is fair use to  be able to define the term better. Naturally there's a ridiculous amount of such cases, including a lot of cases that are either very difficult or even impossible to foresee, so a more detailed definition could be even more problematic.  To prevent misinterpretation of the spirit of the law, I suppose it might be useful to use more specific language about the current points without really making the law too rigid.

That said, the current situation is what it is, and everyone simply has to deal with it.



zero129 said:
Cerebralbore101 said:

Persona and SMT have only ever been on Nintendo or Sony systems with the exception of Persona 1 in Japan. 

Platinum games games' were all multiplats. Of course they would come to steam eventually. 

Spike Chunsoft makes visual novels. That's bread and butter for PC in Japan. 

The majority of Final Fantasy games didn't come to steam until over a decade after their original release. Sure we may see a Steam version of Persona 5 by 2027, but that wouldn't be very surprising at all. By 2027 all games will be digital "games as a service" nonsense anyway. 

When its clear your so ignorant when it comes to PC... Why do you comment in PC section threads?.

Point out the mistake. Or go away theif. 

Nah, I'm not gonna go that route. This is better. 

http://imgur.com/HQyA0w8



Cerebralbore101 said:

Yeah, other people have tried bringing that up too. There's no need for digital preservation. Older consoles and disks work fine to this day. 

You claim there is no need for it, yet others diagree with you, that doesn't make you right over them. Some of us want to rpeserve gaming and physical isn't going to cut it for everyone, not when finite copies are made, lost, sold for insane prices and others that end up broken.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Cerebralbore101 said:
zero129 said:

When its clear your so ignorant when it comes to PC... Why do you comment in PC section threads?.

 

Nah, I'm not gonna go that route. 

But you do, you do this each time something is talked about when it coems to PC, either via emulation or a port job.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Around the Network
Chazore said:
Cerebralbore101 said:

 

Nah, I'm not gonna go that route. 

But you do, you do this each time something is talked about when it coems to PC, either via emulation or a port job.

Not what I was referring to. 



Some posters here (the anti-emulation crowd) warrant a "ignore user" feature for simply everyone. Just wow, some of this crap you people post!

OT: Amazing progress, and on an old 2600k to boot! There are still many PS2 games with problematic emulation, but seeing PS3 emulation proceed like this is amazing.



zero129 said:
Cerebralbore101 said:

Emulation of modern consoles by people that don't own the copyright is a huge deal to me. It enables theft, and like Azuren said, anybody that wants to pretend that is isn't being used for theft is full of shit. The majority of people that use unofficial emulators are theives. Piracy breeds DRM, and that spells the end of consumer rights. 

What if i told you a closed console ecosystem was a form of DRM.

I'd say you were high. 



zero129 said:
Azuren said:

It's actually more like the initial shut down of Napster, a service designed to get free music. It's more like R4 cards, and how they were made illegal in most places.

 

There are tools that help people make things (DVD writers, for example), and tools used to pirate things (like the software used to rip movies from DVDs). Some software and hardware has to justify itself in a legal way to remain legal. Movie ripping is to keep all your media on a server, it's totally not ever used to pirate and the programmers don't support the use of it as such, right? But we know who's fucking using it and what for. The R4 card was so you can rip your games all into one convenient card, stopping the need to constantly change, right? Except Nintendo proved in court that it's purpose was for piracy.

 

I agree that emulators WERE important to preservation of older games, but companies have taken notice of that and there are legitimate ways to get a hold of nearly every title ever made digitally and legally. And yes, there are some games the still need preserving and emulators do that niche job, but there's a much larger number of people out there abusing emulators. Yes it's nice having your games in one spot and not having to worry about whether or not your old console can play them or if the cartridge still works, but there's a much larger group out there just downloading "free games". And no, it's not like banning cars because some people get killed by them. It's more like banning fake weed; the manufacturer can say it's for one thing and put "do not smoke" warnings on it, but we know what everyone is buying it for.

 

After contemplation, though, I don't feel like banning emulators would accomplish anything. Like with marijuana, people will use them regardless of their legality. The difference is no one would ever get caught driving with emulators in their cars. All we can do is watch the DRM get more and more invasive, with pirates and hackers overriding it with greater difficulty each time, claiming to be the heroes of a problem they caused.

Tell the truth. The only reason you and others using strawman tactics as to "Why emulation should be illegal" is the fact you hate seeing your exclusives playable on another platform.

 

Tell the truth. The only reason you and others want emulation of consoles on PC is so you can play games for free without having to purchase the console itself. But to be more direct and actually respond to this: No, I'm actually going to college to get into the field of game design. What you're doing (emulating a game without owning it) is piracy, and actively detriments those who worked on the game. And before you start with the tired "I wasn't going to but it anyway" argument, I'm not going to buy a $100k car. So it's okay if I just take it, right?

You wasnt too upset when you seen Zelda BOTW running on Cemu, but now its a problem why?.

I don't believe I posted about it on these forums, but I actually was and still am against emulating BotW. I even chastised a friend for emulating it, which resulted in a temporary rift between us.

 

Emulation is legal this is a fact, how a user uses it is up to them. Piracy is more of a problem on the actual console hardware then on an emu.

Emulation is legal. Owning ROMs and ISOs for games is legal. Emulating a game that you don't own is piracy. Whether the emulation takes place on a PC (which is much more relevant here considering the topic) or on modified consoles doesn't affect the legality of it.

 

 

Many other much bigger sites then VGC can openly talk about such topics as they see emulation is a big part of the PC community. Their mods will will stop users such as yourself who bring emulation topics off topic and into the realm of piracy discussion.

That's nice. Except VGC promotes open discussion, and the topic of emulating a game that is still for sale will always boil down to the ethics (or lack thereof) of emulating a game you don't own. Because be real: most people who emulate this will never physically or digitally own the game in question.

 

VGC needs to keep emulation topics clean of piracy talk thats it. No other rule when it comes to emulation needs to be enforced other then no discussions of piracy, no asking for roms, no asking for illegal files, no talking about illegal files, no discussion of piracy at all, even if this involves discussions of how emulators can be a tool of piracy.

I would argue that a website known for tracking sales should be wholly against emulation topics, and those who post information of emulation (where to download, how to use, etc) should face moderation. We're not talking about modding, where you must own the game. This isn't a topic about a wronghack or a new SNES emulator. This is about downloading and playing a game that is still in circulation. And only a fool would think that doesn't mean absolutely rampant piracy.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

The really hilarious thing here is that we have all these White Knight Pirates, saying that they are going to "save games from oblivion" by putting them on a PC harddrive, because "the disks and the hardware will expire in fifty years". Yet there are PS4 games available for Digital Download the same as Steam. Do those same users advocate piracy of Steam games for the sake of "preservation"? Nope. Just console games.

Anybody with half a brain can see plain as day that this is about straight up stealing games and nothing more.

Meanwhile, every notable console, and every notable console game is still perfectly playable, on the original hardware, after nearly 40 years of the console industry being around.