Mnementh said:
This thread is better, you put a lot more infos in the OP than just the res-upgrade and the discussion didn't got derailed started with the first answer. I say let's lock the first thread. |
Miyamoto made the thread first, It's only fair that this thread is closed, Miyamoto can copy the op of this thread and put in the other, I dont care :)
| AngryLittleAlchemist said: I don't understand why the world would have to be smaller on the Switch version? Just decrease the draw-distance and have the worlds load more once you get closer to the section loading. The Xbox 360 version was soooooooooooooooo fucking small compared to the PC version. |
well you are comparing something with a limit... to something which is near infinite in size, so yes, the comparison is very very heavily against the X360 lol
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
Ganoncrotch said:
well you are comparing something with a limit... to something which is near infinite in size, so yes, the comparison is very very heavily against the X360 lol |
But that's what i"m saying. Even with consoles having lower specs all they'd have to do is decrease draw distance...there shouldn't be any reason not to have the game as big on a console as PC. I don't remember either version having tons of gigabytes of content.
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
But that's what i"m saying. Even with consoles having lower specs all they'd have to do is decrease draw distance...there shouldn't be any reason not to have the game as big on a console as PC. I don't remember either version having tons of gigabytes of content. |
It's not just about the draw distance though, keep in mind that the X360 has a total of 512mb of system RAM to store the world in without requiring loading, the Switch has 4GB and the X1/PS4 carry 8GB so that is pretty much where the worlds size limits comes into play.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
Ganoncrotch said:
It's not just about the draw distance though, keep in mind that the X360 has a total of 512mb of system RAM to store the world in without requiring loading, the Switch has 4GB and the X1/PS4 carry 8GB so that is pretty much where the worlds size limits comes into play. |
I guess but 4gb is a lot i mean my ram was like 2 gb when i played minecraft
Edit : So recommended ram is 4gb and minimum is 2. So i guess it makes sense why it would be smaller on Switch because it probably has about 3 gb of free ram. although the worlds don't get smaller if you have 2gb on pc as opposed t o 4gb, so who knows.
still an ugly boring game to me.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| System | Splitscreen Support (Using Component or HDMI) | World Size Limit (in blocks) | Leaderboard Support | Ad-Hoc Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | No | 30,000,192 x 30,000,192* | No | No** |
| Xbox 360 | Yes | 864 x 864 | Yes | No |
| PlayStation 3 | Yes | 864 x 864 | Yes | No |
| Xbox One | Yes | 5120 × 5120 | Yes | No |
| PlayStation 4 | Yes | 5120 × 5120 | Yes | No |
| PlayStation Vita | No | 864 x 864 | Yes | Yes |
| Wii U | Yes | 864 x 864 | No | No |
| Nintendo Switch | Yes | 3072 × 3072 | No | Yes |
World size limit seems to be mainly about built-in memory as even the humble Vita competes with 360,PS3 and wii u and Vita has 640MB of memory just over 360/ps3 but below wii u. The 4GB of the Switch seems to enable an intermediate world size limit but can't match the 2 8GB consoles. If the PS4 and Xbox one had been 4GB consoles they probably would be at the same world size as Switch.
Shikamo said:
sorry bro, i haven't seen :/, a mod will delete this thread soon. |
You mean you haven't looked.
Latest topics is a great page. You should visit it sometimes.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
vivster said:
You mean you haven't looked.
Latest topics is a great page. You should visit it sometimes. |
Are you new here? This is very common to happen and it was just a lack of attention from me and I already apologized to Miyamoto, the only thing i can do now is wait for some moderator to lock this thread.
Shikamo said:
Are you new here? This is very common to happen and it was just a lack of attention from me and I already apologized to Miyamoto, the only thing i can do now is wait for some moderator to lock this thread. |
That it happens very commonly is just one more reason to remind the thread creators every single time. I mean I have posted a dupe thread before by accident but that wasn't of a thread that was literally centimeters away from my thread.
If you really couldn't see the thread that had the exact same headline as yours I suggest using the browser search function next time. "ctrl + f". In this case Minecraft would've been a great search term. That way the browser does the looking for you :)
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
