I would call it "Super Smash Bros. 1 with pretty graphics"

Brawl is "Super Smash Bros 1 with more characters, items, stages, challenges, modes, hell better everything."

Auron said: Torillian said: misteromar mk4 said: I pray Nintendo dont stoop to these tatics to rip gamers of like Sony. I'm sorry but I have to comment on this. How exactly is putting out an incomplete version a year early for the hardcore fans who can't wait a year for the full thing ripping them off? Hell even the price I would argue is dictated by what people will pay, and as we've seen obviously some people are willing to pay this amount to play even a portion of the game a year early, and I doubt they feel they're being ripped off. So I guess the point is, just because you don't think you would buy it, doesn't mean it's ripping off gamers. Ripping off gamers would be something they were forced to buy. Noone forces the hardcore fans to buy prologue.  Exactly, what a fool he is thinking Sony is ripping people off by giving them choices.

1 month or 1 year it wouldn´t mutter I would still not buy it and it would still be a rip off if tNintendo tried to follow Sony, the fact remains that after 1month/1year you would still have paid 1,5 times for the same game instead of only buying it once. Not even if you count in the ammount of money you would get back by selling it used would change my mind cause it would still be a rip off nu mutter what company would use this tactic.

Auron said: Torillian said: misteromar mk4 said: I pray Nintendo dont stoop to these tatics to rip gamers of like Sony. I'm sorry but I have to comment on this. How exactly is putting out an incomplete version a year early for the hardcore fans who can't wait a year for the full thing ripping them off? Hell even the price I would argue is dictated by what people will pay, and as we've seen obviously some people are willing to pay this amount to play even a portion of the game a year early, and I doubt they feel they're being ripped off. So I guess the point is, just because you don't think you would buy it, doesn't mean it's ripping off gamers. Ripping off gamers would be something they were forced to buy. Noone forces the hardcore fans to buy prologue.  Exactly, what a fool he is thinking Sony is ripping people off by giving them choices.

How abouts this, finish the game first and then sell it. If they do want to release a 6 track demo, it should be FREE, like every other demo. Fool!

 

misteromar mk4 said: If they do want to release a 6 track demo, it should be FREE, like every other demo. Fool!

That´s the fracking truth 

I would rather that the company working on said game would spend the time actually finishing the game instead of wasting time on a demo that they want to make money off and I can´t stop wondering how much time would be shaved of the actuall release date of GT5 if they didn´t waste all that time in the making of the prologue or how much time was the GT5 pushed back because of prologue so that the costumers don´t feel ripped off. I bet that the game would be able to be released by christmas at least if not more if it wasn´t because of the GT5P.

If this was a game I wanted I would be pissed off if they did that just so I could play a demo of the game and they make more money out of me instead of actually finishing said game.

If this happened to MGS I would be really pissed if they had a demo this summer and the game was pushed back to next year because of said demo.

1 month no, 1 year still no, I never buy a demo, better a complete game.

dsoverpsp said: pichu_pichu said: dsoverpsp said: Okay then.. What if they put down the price to 20 dollars and a month a way? Still No i bet it would still sell at least 2 million despite everybody saying no

A year earlier yes, a month ...maybe 300k

I never buy into pieces. If I hear something better is coming out right around the corner. I ALWAYS wait for that better something, because as soon as you buy something, it is outdated. So why not own the best of that particular something you want?