Wasn't your point that it's 2017 so it makes sense to focus  2017 games and not on 2018?
If that is it, i disagree.
What makes people confident after the Wii U fiasco is to show that in medium to long run, Nintendo will have great support. But so far they haven't shown that (not in January and, by the looks it, not at E3 aswell).

"same time last year" Switch wasn't even properly announced. So, why is that relevant?

Yes, they do have a 1st year to brag about - with 2 ports being the main drivers of the console!
And no, Fire Emblem Warriors, Xenoblade aren't system sellers. Well, Fire Emblem Warriors is still a wild card, if you will.

I was speaking about original, in-house games.
And as i showed you: 4 games for a 10 month period.
And when they don't show anything significant in January and prepare themselves to do so again at E3, when they bring 4 games to cover a 10 month periosd, given their recent history of failed promises, i think it makes all the sense to question if 2018 is going to fulfill on their promises.

E3 2014 was big because it showed that, for the first time, Wii U had something to look forward. It was the peak of their development.
E3 2017 was supposed to go in that direction after a January presentation with not to much to look forward, from a 1st part standpoint.
I don't have a number. But my criticism wasn't about numbers, but focus.

You  forgot XC 2 and FE 2018 as in-house development titles.

They aren't huge sellers so he don't count them as games, because surely no one would ever think, "hey that system has a lot of diverse games, I'ma buy it!" or "I don't like platformers but I love RPGs" or "Splatoon 2 is great but it alone isn't enough for- oh wait it also has Fire Emblem?" No people buy consoles for a single game only, totally!

You  forgot XC 2 and FE 2018 as in-house development titles.

Of Course they are, great concept, great branding and marketing, great launch game, and great system seller games in 1st 9 months of console life, basicly all thigs that Wii U didnt had. And sales and popularity of Switch proves that.

I saying that because they made great job with 1st 9 months compared to Wii U even to 3DS also, I saying that because Switch is their main platform and they resources cannot be divided like before. First they are currently 5 original games in 1st 9 months of Switch, also but we could get announced another at E3, but who cares if all games are not original!? Does anybody cares that Zelda BotW and MK8D are not just Switch exclusives!? Not rely, sales proves that. Like I wrote, every new console is totally different thing, compare GC to Wii, Wii to Wii U and now Wii U to Switch.

Nintendo E3 Digital Event is basically bigger Nintendo Direct, people calling Nintendo Directs Mini Nintendo E3s. And yes, last ND is perfect for comparison because with E3 Direct because both have "focus" in title. Yes this is E3, and they will bring their A games. We will see rest of 2017. and some of 2018. games, but main focus will be on those 2017. games because logical they will be out 1st and thats why for them they have TreeHouse play, stage demos, tournaments. Again, I dont see how you can compare 2015. E3 where Wii U was dead for quiet time and when Nintendo obviously dropped support for Wii U, and 1st E3 for brand new and successful platform.

You can question their strategie, but their current strategie is very successful. In past Nintendo also did not revealed console with only 3 minute video 5 months before launch and had full presentation only 2.5 months before launch, in past Nintendo also didnt had mobile games..

Scorpio is high end product and definitely will not be problem for Switch at all. But you forgetting that Nintendo won last E3 with just one game.

"This was supposed to be the year where they showed us why we should trust them and give them our money" Its not about trust, its point only about how much curent product is appealing, and Switch is very appealing, from hardware/koncept point and from great games. And Switch sales proves that. "Repetition of January's presentation". Relly!? So you already seen Nintendo E3 presentation!? Why you sound like E3 already passed!? You also said you expeting to see some 2018. games and now you say "Repetition of January's presentation"!?

Nintendo made 2017. very strong for Switch, like wrote if we talk about huge and system seller games, Switch 1st 9 monts is probably strongest compared to any other Nintendo console, and most likly we will see some unannounced game/games for rest of 2017. So why they would release more games in 2017. when can instead make 2018. also strong for Switch!? Why they didnt realise Mario Odyssey on launch alongside with Zelda BotW and instead they made Mario Odyssey holiday season game!? Because there were no need for two huge game on launch and it's better to spread them out.

So you are gonna be nonsensical then, discounting games for reasons the majority clearly doesn't care about, disagreeing with what's currently being proven to work, thinking E3 2014 focusing on way later titles rather than a consistent schedule is the way to go despite Wii U still failing, beliving every game ever has to be a major system seller or it's irrelevant, not realizing games can be announced outside of E3.

Yeah, I'll just let Switch's continued success and each inevitable 2018 announcement do the talking for me from here on.  

They aren't huge sellers so he don't count them as games, because surely no one would ever think, "hey that system has a lot of diverse games, I'ma buy it!" or "I don't like platformers but I love RPGs" or "Splatoon 2 is great but it alone isn't enough for- oh wait it also has Fire Emblem?" No people buy consoles for a single game only, totally!

XC 2 is not an in-house developed game as it comes from a 2nd party studio.
Ididn't count FE because it's a 2018 game, not a 2017 game. And even FE Warriors is being developed by a 3rd party studio.

XC 2 is a 2nd party game? LOL

My, how clueless can you be?Monolithsoft is 100% owned by Nintendo.The same way that the EAD is a name of a team insine Nintendo, its also true for Monolith.I mean, why would you even consider monolith second party for some reason, but not Inteligent systems?

This is getting ridiculous.There is not even a shred of evidence that points out that Nintendo has "nothing" indevelopment for 2018( hence the FE example) and the fact that Sony and Microsoft show games that still take years to release is due to the fact that they dont have enough games releasing on that year to show.Nintendo does not have that issue, at least for now, with the Seitch.

And also, why are you discarting second party games, like FE Warriors?They still take resources away from Nintendo, since they still get involved in the project and, at the end of the day, its a game.If you are comparing the number of games and the presentation of them to other companies, they are as valid as first party games.