What? That makes absolutely no sense. You clearly are opposing something you do not understand. People who make billions need to invest their money into something, and that something creates jobs and jobs create wealth. What the billionares own, are shares that have an imaginary value that's based on how they are respected on the market. You can't save money because inflation eats away the billionaires savings.

Equal distribution of wealth have no value by itself, as everyone can be piss-poor. What better welfare needs, is investments from people who have money to invest. Going a decade back, the main driver of global economy was investments that were made to China. In similar fashion there should be some driver (that has money to invest) in global economics to have GNP growing again.

What's causing today's financial problems is (loan) money that's leaving the market faster than there's new (loan) money coming on the market and inflation eating away the value of old debt.

Some food for thought: let's say a square meter in an appartment in Helsinki would be worth the same as square kilometer of desert in Africa, which would be more valuable, the the square meter or square kilometer? In the current financial atmosphere they'd be worth the same, but clearly how the real value should be calculated is much more complex than just to compare the monetary value.

Why do you assume that nobody would work? It's not humans all of a sudden started working with the introduction of capitalism.

The problem is not that we don't have enough food or energy. The problem is that we're not using the resources efficiently. Of course there's going to be work, but the current system works in a way that not everyone even can work. There's always unemployed people.

No, because Nazism relies on perpetual conflict to exist. It's still based on an economic system with winners and losers, so even when everything's homogenous, there'll be issues.

Because with true socialism or communism, apathy is rewarded by free stuff while working is punished by the government stealing what you worked for. What is the incentive to work or work harder if you taxed more for it while people who do nothing get your stuff?

Capitalism only further incentivises what people do naturally (provide for oneself and family) and it allows many paths for people to improve their life by rewarding their effort. You want to become rich, you can by being smart with your money, life choices and what you do as a living. If you're apathetic or dumb, you'll stay poor. It's fair to everyone because you reap exactly you sow good or bad. If someone is disabled to a certain point or truly unable to work, they're taken care of.

So, I now have an idea of what you're referring to when you say communism. The government wouldn't steal anything because there'd be no government.